unjust enrichment california

2921 results for unjust enrichment california

  • vLex Rating
  • 838 F.3d 958 (9th Cir. 2016), 13-56644, Ebner v. Fresh, Inc.

    ... Submitted January 11, 2016, Pasadena, California. . . Page 959. . . ... unjust enrichment cause of action was mooted. . ...

  • 783 F.3d 753 (9th Cir. 2015), 12-17596, Astiana v. Hain Celestial Group, Inc.

    In this putative nationwide class action Plaintiffs claimed that they were deceived into purchasing Defendants’ “natural” cosmetics, which contained allegedly synthetic and artificial ingredients. Plaintiffs sought injunctive relief and damages under the federal Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, California’s unfair competition and false advertising laws, and common law theories of fraud and quasi-contra

    ...; JASON NATURAL PRODUCTS, INC., a California corporation, Defendants-Appellees . No. 12-17596 ... is not a standalone cause of action for " unjust enrichment," which is synonymous with " ...

  • 256 F.3d 446 (6th Cir. 2001), 99-1807, Wrench, LLC v Taco Bell Corp.

    ... back to Taco Bell's headquarters in California.         Upon returning to California, ... . court dismissed appellants' unjust enrichment, conversion, and dilution claims on ...

  • 666 F.3d 581 (9th Cir. 2012), 09-55376, Mazza v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.

    ... Court for the Central District of California, Valerie Baker Fairbank, District Judge, ... Code § 1750 et seq., and a claim for unjust enrichment.          On September 24, ...

  • 741 F.3d 1061 (9th Cir. 2014), 11-55592, Berger v. Home Depot USA, Inc.

    ... Court for the Central District of California, S. James Otero, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. ... Remedies Act, and common-law theories of unjust enrichment and money had and received. Cal. Bus. ...

  • 345 U.S. 247 (1953), 150, Western Pacific Railroad Corp. v. Western Pacific Railroad Co.

    ... petitioners' theory that respondents had unjustly enriched themselves by wrongfully appropriating a ... was founded on a theory of unjust enrichment; jurisdiction of the federal courts was invoked ... grounded in diversity of citizenship, California law is the law of the forum and may govern the ...

  • 593 F.3d 936 (9th Cir. 2010), 08-56154, Chae v. SLM Corp.

    ... Court for the Central District of California, Manuel L. Real, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. ... claims allege breach of contract, unjust enrichment, breach of the implied covenant of ...

  • 615 F.3d 1023 (8th Cir. 2010), 09-2843, Avritt v. Reliastar Life Ins. Co.

    ... class certification for a group of California residents who purchased fixed deferred retirement ... covenant of good faith and fair dealing, unjust enrichment, violation of the Washington Consumer ...

  • 598 F.3d 1115 (9th Cir. 2010), 09-55123, Chandler v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

    ... Court for the Central District of California, Gary A. Feess, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. ...; (2) conversion; (3) unjust" enrichment; and (4) declaratory relief.     \xC2"...

  • 96 F.3d 1151 (9th Cir. 1996), 94-15633, Paracor Finance, Inc. v. General Elec. Capital Corp.

    ..., Huddleson & Tatum, San Francisco, California, for the plaintiffs-appellants. ...The Investors also brought a claim of unjust enrichment against GE Capital alone. The ...

  • 963 F.2d 1269 (9th Cir. 1992), 91-55471, In re De Laurentiis Entertainment Group Inc.

    ... Court for the Central District of California.         Before: PREGERSON, D.W. NELSON, ... those services when necessary to prevent unjust enrichment of the defendant. B. Witkin, Summary ...

  • California Supreme Court Upholds Limited Right of Carrier to Seek Recovery of Unreasonable Fees Directly from Insured’s Independent Counsel

    On August 10, 2015, in Hartford Casualty Insurance Company v. J.R. Marketing, LLC, et al., the California Supreme Court held that in some circumstances insurers may seek reimbursement of payments made to the insured's independent Cumis counsel, legal counsel chosen by the insured when the insurer has a conflict of interest.

    ...The Court's ruling was based primarily on a theory of unjust enrichment and expands the holding of Buss v Superior Court (1997) 16 ...

  • Muffin Mix Class Action Survives Dismissal

    Musgrave v. ICC/Marie Callender’s Gourmet Products Division, No. 3:14-cv-02006-JST (N.D. Cal.): In this putative class action alleging that defendant’s bread and muffin mixes are falsely labeled and marketed as “all natural” when they in fact contain Sodium Acid Pyrophosphate (“SAPP”), a synthetic ingredient, a federal judge in California dismissed plaintiff’s unjust enrichment and injunctive...

    ... ingredient, a federal judge in California dismissed plaintiff’s unjust enrichment and ...

  • Do Kanye’s Words Speak Louder than Tidal’s TOS?

    A Chicago law firm has challenged Jay-Z and Kanye West, filing a class action complaint for violations of the California Business & Professions Code, fraudulent inducement and unjust enrichment in the Northern District of California. The complaint alleges that Tidal, a music streaming service owned by Shawn “Jay Z” Carter and Kanye West, was in financial straits earlier this year but that...

    ... action complaint for violations of the California Business & Professions Code, fraudulent t and unjust enrichment in the Northern District of ...

  • Court Dismisses Equitable Relief Claims in Octopus False Ad Case

    Fonseca v. Goya Foods, Inc., No. 5:16-cv-02559 (N.D. Cal.): The Court entered an order granting in part Defendant’s motion to dismiss this putative class action for breach of express and implied warranties, breach of the implied warranty of fitness, unjust enrichment, and violations of California’s CLRA, UCL, FAL, negligent misrepresentation, and fraud, which alleged that...

    ... breach of the implied warranty of fitness, unjust enrichment, and violations of California’s ...

  • Plaintiffs in Two All-Natural Food Lawsuits Voluntarily Dismiss Claims

    In both Astiana v. Ben & Jerry’s Homemade, Inc., No 4:11cv04937 (N.D. Cal.), and Thurston v. Conopco Inc., No. 4:10cv04937 (N.D. Cal.), plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed with prejudice their claims in putative class actions alleging claims under California’s UCL, FAL, and unjust enrichment based on allegations that defendants’ products were misleadingly labeled “all natural.” Astiana. Thurston.

    ... class actions alleging claims under California’s UCL, FAL, and unjust enrichment based on ...

  • Partial Summary Judgment Granted in Hershey Suit

    Khasin v. The Hershey Co., No. 5:12cv01862 (N.D. Cal.): The court partially granted summary judgment dismissing several claims in a putative class action alleging claims under California’s UCL, FAL, CLRA, and unjust enrichment that claims defendant made misrepresentations about its products spanning antioxidant claims, nutrient content claims without the proper disclosures, health claims, sugar...

    ... class action alleging claims under California’s UCL, FAL, CLRA, and unjust enrichment that ...

  • Court Grants Summary Judgment on Antioxidant Claims

    Khasin v. The Hershey Co., No. 5:12cv01862 (N.D. Cal.): In this putative class action alleging claims under California’s UCL, FAL, CLRA, and unjust enrichment claiming Defendant made misrepresentations about its products spanning antioxidant claims, nutrient content claims without the proper disclosures, health claims, sugar free claims, unlawful serving sizes, improperly listing polyglycerol...

    ... class action alleging claims under California’s UCL, FAL, CLRA, and unjust enrichment ...

  • Round 2 in Dennis v. Kellogg: Class Action Settlements with Cy Pres Relief

    The district court in Dennis v. Kellogg recently granted preliminary approval of a revised class action settlement. Kellogg is a class action alleging unjust enrichment, as well as violation of California’s Unfair Competition Law and Consumer Legal Remedies Act and similar laws of other states.

    ...Kellogg is a class action alleging unjust enrichment, as well as violation of ... Gonzalez in the Southern District of California preliminarily approved a revised class action ...

  • Partial Dismissal Without Prejudice In Pork and Beans False Advertising Suit

    Tye v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., No. 8:15-cv-1615 (C.D. Cal.): The Court issued a minute order granting-in-part Defendants’ motion to dismiss in this putative class action asserting violations of multiple states’ (California, New Jersey, Pennsylvania) consumer protection statutes, and raising claims of breaches of warranty, unjust enrichment, breach of implied contract, and breach of the implied...

    ... violations of multiple states’ (California, New Jersey, Pennsylvania) consumer protection ... raising claims of breaches of warranty, unjust enrichment, breach of implied contract, and ...

  • Court Denies Class Certification in “All Natural” Case

    Jones v. Conagra Foods, Inc., No. 3:12-cv-1633 (N.D. Cal.): In a putative class action raising claims under California’s UCL, FAL, CLRA, and unjust enrichment, plaintiff alleged that 1) defendant’s Hunt’s tomato products are misrepresented as “100% Natural” or “Free of artificial ingredients & preservatives” when in fact they contain citric acid and/or calcium chloride; 2)...

    ... class action raising claims under California’s UCL, FAL, CLRA, and unjust enrichment, ...

  • Court Partially Dismisses Case Involving “All Natural” and “Reduced Fat” Claims

    Hall v. Diamond Foods, Inc., No. 14cv2148 (N.D. Cal.): In a putative class action alleging claims under California’s UCL, FAL, CLRA, and for unjust enrichment, the plaintiffs claimed that the defendant falsely labels and advertises its Kettle and Tias! chips as, among other things, “all natural,” “reduced fat,” or “40% reduced fat” when, in fact,...

    ... class action alleging claims under California’s UCL, FAL, CLRA, and for unjust enrichment, ...

  • New Filings for December 10, 2015

    Minker et al. v. Ricola USA, Inc., No. 1:15-cv-9014 (S.D.N.Y.): Putative class action alleging claims of negligent misrepresentation, breach of express warranty, and unjust enrichment on behalf of a nationwide class, violations of California’s CLRA, UCL, and FAL on behalf of a California subclass, and violations of New York’s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act...

    ..., breach of express warranty, and unjust enrichment on behalf of a nationwide class, tions of California’s CLRA, UCL, and FAL on behalf of a California ...

  • Partial Dismissal of Tuna Suit

    Soto v. Safeway Inc., No. 3:15-cv-05078 (N.D. Cal.): In this putative class action alleging Defendant’s five-ounce canned tuna products are under-filled and substantially underweight, the Court granted in part and denied in part Defendant’s motion to dismiss claims for breach of warranty, unjust enrichment, negligent misrepresentation, fraud, and violations of California’s consumer protection...

    ... to dismiss claims for breach of warranty, unjust enrichment, negligent misrepresentation, fraud, nd violations of California’s consumer protection statutes.  The Court ...

  • Friday Wrap-Up (November 30, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web

    Here are the noteworthy trade secret, non-compete and cybersecurity stories from the past week, as well one or two that I missed over the past couple of weeks:  Noteworthy Trade Secret and Non-Compete Posts and Cases:  A California federal jury has ordered Best Buy Co. Inc. to pay $22 million for unjust enrichment after finding...

    ... and Non-Compete Posts and Cases:  A California federal jury has ordered Best Buy Co. Inc. to pay $22 million for unjust enrichment after finding the retailer willfully ...