united states v kubrick brief
347 results for united states v kubrick brief
-
vLex Rating
-
984 F.2d 16 (1st Cir. 1993), 92-1143, Santiago-Ramirez v. Secretary of Dept. of Defense
... No. 92-1143. United States Court of Appeals, First ... Llambias, Santurce, PR, on brief", for plaintiff, appellant. \xC2"...United . . States v. Kubrick, 444 U.S. 111, 113, 100 S.Ct. 352, ...
-
379 F.3d 1303 (Fed. Cir. 2004), 03-5162, Federal Nat. Mortg. Ass'n v. United Sates
... v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellant. No. 03-5162. United States ...With him on the brief was Thomas D. Johnston. Ellen ...Kubrick, 444 U.S. 111, 117-18, 100 S.Ct. 352, 62 L.Ed.2d ...
-
713 Fed.Appx. 49 (2nd Cir. 2017), 16-3446, Hodges v. Glenholme School
... No. 16-3446. United States Court of Appeals, Second ... on the brief) Law Offices of Mitchell Garabedian, ...Kubrick, 444. U.S. 111, 122, 100 S.Ct. ...
-
284 F.3d 930 (8th Cir. 2001), 01-2449, Garza v United States Bureau of Prisons
...Id.; cf. United States v. Kubrick, 444 U.S. 111, 123-24 (1979) (finding that where a plaintiff is aware of ...Regalado's file." Despite allegations in its brief, counsel for the Estate admitted at oral argument that he did not have ...
-
Mind-Control Experimentation: A Travesty of Human Rights in theUnited States
I. Introduction II. Mind-Control Experimentation In The United States A. Project Paperclip B. MKULTRA Project: Experiments Using Adult Subjects 1. The LSD Experiments 2. The Cameron Experiments on Adults C. MKULTRA Project: Experiments Using Children 1. Survivor Narratives 2. Corroborating Evidence ofExperimentation on Children III. Justice For Mind-Controlexperimentation Survivors A....
... end ofWorId War II through the 1970s, the United States govemment engaged in mind-control ...Survivors will have only two brief years afier their first knowledge of the ...Supp. 77, 84 (D.D.C 1988) (citing Kubrick v. United States, 444 U.S. 111, 122 (1979». . ...
-
730 F.2d 842 (2nd Cir. 1984), 56, O'Rourke v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.
... and . United States of America, ...Wilowski, Jamaica, N.Y., on brief), for ...See United States v. Kubrick, 444 U.S. 111, 117-18, 100 S.Ct. ...
-
150 F.3d 1380 (Fed. Cir. 1998), 97-7060, Bazalo v. West
...No. 97-7060. United States Court of Appeals, Federal ...With him on the brief was Michael Jay Singer, Attorney. Of ...Kubrick, 444 U.S. 111, 117-18, 100 S.Ct. ...
-
890 F.2d 1050 (9th Cir. 1989), 87-4253, Outman v. United States
...Kubrick, 444 U.S. 111, 120, 100 S.Ct. 352, 358, 62 L.Ed.2d 259 (1979), the Supreme ...This was not discovered until 1982" (Reply Brief at 8); "Under Kubrick one needs to discover both the injury (brain damage) ...
-
764 F.3d 1199 (10th Cir. 2014), 12-3295, National Credit Union Administration Bd. v. Nomura Home Equity Loan, Inc.
... MARKETS ASSOCIATION; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Amici Curiae . ..., California, with him on the briefs), appearing for Appellants. . . ... E.g., United States v. Kubrick , 444 U.S. 111, 117, 100 S.Ct. 352, ...
-
710 Fed.Appx. 823 (11th Cir. 2017), 16-11727, Echemendia v. United States
...2010) (quoting United. States v. Kubrick, 444 U.S. 111, 122, 100 S.Ct. 352, 62. L.Ed.2d 259 (1979)). We ...Id. at 779. . . 4 Plaintiff also discusses in his brief. excusable neglect under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5). This. ...
-
Rotella v Wood, 022300 USSC98896
...See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber ...United States v. Kubrick, 444 U.S. 111, 122. A person ...Brief for Petitioner 3; App. 20 24. . . ...
-
381 F.3d 6 (1st Cir. 2004), 03-2143, American Cyanamid Co. v. Capuano
...CAPUANO, Jr.; Jack Capuano; United Sanitation, Inc., Defendants, .... No. 03-2143. . United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit . ...brief, for appellants. ...Kubrick, 444 U.S. 111, 117, 100 S.Ct. 352, ...
-
180 F.3d 1124 (10th Cir. 1999), 97-3220, Franklin Sav. Corp. v. United States
...Pete Smith, (Jonathan A. Margolies with him on the brief"), McDowell, Rice, Smith & Gaar, Kansas City, Missouri, for Appellants. \xC2"...Kubrick, 444 U.S. 111, 117-18, 100 S.Ct. 352, 62 L.Ed.2d 259 (1979)). This court ...
-
409 F.3d 155 (3rd Cir. 2005), 01-2468, United States v. Bendolph
... We asked the parties and amici 2 to brief four main issues. First, may the government. . waive the AEDPA ...Kubrick, 444 U.S. 111, 117, 100 S.Ct. 352, 357, 62 L.Ed.2d 259 (1979) (internal ...
-
4 F.3d 985 (4th Cir. 1993), 92-2420, Kelly v. U.S.
... v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ... On Brief: Wade E. Byrd, Berry & Byrd, ...Kubrick, 444 U.S. 111 (1979), the Supreme ...
-
980 F.2d 1159 (8th Cir. 1992), 92-1992, Arigo v. United States
...United States v. Kubrick, 444 U.S. 111, 117, 62 L.Ed. 2d 259, 100 S.Ct. 352 (1979). A claimant need ... be equitably tolled, but the Government addresses the issue in its brief. In Irwin v. Veterans Admin., 498 U.S. 89, ----, 111 S.Ct. 453, 457, 112 ...
-
319 F.3d 1346 (Fed. Cir. 2003), 00-7172, Scarborough v. Principi
.... No. 00-7172. . United States Court of Appeals, Federal ...Of counsel on the brief was Peter J. Sarda, Wallace, Creech ...Kubrick, 444 U.S. 111, 118, 100 S.Ct. 352, ...
-
168 F.3d 581 (1st Cir. 1999), 98-1889, Dziura v. United States
... Gerald Glasser, with whom Kalill, Glasser and Associates was on brief, for appellants. Sara Ann Ketchum, Attorney, Tax ...2 See United States v. Kubrick, 444 U.S. 111, 122-24, 100 S.Ct. 352, 62 L.Ed.2d 259 (1979); Rodriguez v. ...
-
542 F.3d 1121 (7th Cir. 2008), 07-3406, Five Points Road Joint Venture v. Johanns
..., Secretary of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture, ... an introductory section of its brief, the Government urges us to keep in ...(quoting United States v. Kubrick, 444 U.S. 111, 118, 100 S.Ct. 352, ...
-
838 F.2d 1445 (6th Cir. 1988), 84-3653, Pinney Dock and Transport Co. v. Penn Cent. Corp.
.... United States Court of Appeals, Sixth ... and Litton appeals for briefing and oral argument. ...Kubrick, 444 U.S. 111, 117, 100 S.Ct. 352, ...
-
702 F.2d 29 (1st Cir. 1983), 82-1449, Galarza v. Zagury
... No. 82-1449. United States Court of Appeals, First ... Suris, San Juan, P.R., were on brief, for appellee. ...Kubrick, 444 U.S. 111, 100 S.Ct. 352, 62 ...
-
17 F.3d 836 (6th Cir. 1994), 92-2053, Kelley v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Co.
.... Nos. 92-2053, 92-2054. . United States Court of Appeals, Sixth ...Firestone (argued and briefed), Office of Atty. Gen., ...Kubrick, 444 U.S. 111, 117, 100 S.Ct. 352, ...
-
549 F.3d 1148 (7th Cir. 2008), 07-2503, In re Ross-Tousey
... v. . William T. Neary, United States Trustee-Appellee. . No. ... had jurisdiction in its reply brief. This Court denied the UST's motion ...Kubrick, 444 U.S. 111, 117, 100 S.Ct. 352, ...
-
768 F.3d 580 (6th Cir. 2014), 10-1934, Ford Motor Co. v. United States
When a taxpayer is a large corporation such as Ford, it often takes years for the IRS to conduct an audit of the corporation’s tax liability. When the IRS determines that the taxpayer underpaid its taxes, the taxpayer is liable for underpayment interest that accrued while the IRS analyzed its tax liability, 26 U.S.C. 6601(a). If the IRS determines that the taxpayer overpaid its taxes for the year
.... . ON BRIEF: . . Gregory G. Garre, Katherine I. Twomey, LATHAM & ...515, 116 L.Ed.2d 496 (1991) (quoting United States v. Kubrick , 444 U.S. 111, 118, 100 S.Ct. 352, 62 L.Ed.2d 259 (1979)). . ...
-
8 F.3d 1121 (7th Cir. 1993), 92-1851, Eckstein v. Balcor Film Investors
.... Nos. 92-1851, 92-2510. . United States Court of Appeals, Seventh ...See United States v. Kubrick, 444 U.S. 111, 124, 100 S.Ct. 352, ...Other literature can be brief precisely because an inquiring ...