standard form 700
- 49 CFR 571.208 - Standard No. 208; Occupant crash protection
466 U.S. 668 (1984), 82-1554, Strickland v. Washington
... given the totality of the circumstances." After outlining standards for judging whether a defense counsel fulfilled the duty to investigate ... Florida law -- that is sufficiently like a trial in its adversarial format and in the existence of standards for decision that counsel's role in the ...
- 17 CFR 229.10 - (Item 10) General
- 49 C.F.R. 173.403 - Definitions
__ U.S. __ (2016), 15-274, Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt
Texas House Bill 2 (2013) required that a “physician performing or inducing an abortion . . . must, on the date [of service], have active admitting privileges at a hospital . . . not further than 30 miles from the” abortion facility, and that the facility meet the state’s “minimum standards . . . for ambulatory surgical centers.” As a basis for enjoining enforcement, the district court found: as...
... [195 L.Ed.2d 671] to meet the " minimum standards . . . for ambulatory surgical centers" under Texas law. Before. ...But an. expert may testify in the " form of an opinion" as. long as that opinion rests upon " sufficient ...
- 40 C.F.R. 52.21 - Prevention of significant deterioration of air quality
505 U.S. 833 (1992), Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey
...Only the most convincing justification under accepted standards of precedent could suffice to demonstrate that a later decision overruling ..., to continue to impart its own preferences on the States in the form of a complex abortion code. Pp. 964-966. 4. The correct ...
- 40 C.F.R. 51.166 - Prevention of significant deterioration of air quality
__ U.S. __ (2014), 13-354, Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.
...The corporate form alone cannot explain it because RFRA indisputably protects nonprofit ... Government has failed to satisfy RFRA's least-restrictive-means standard. HHS has not shown that it lacks other means of achieving its desired goal ...
501 U.S. 722 (1991), 89-7662, Coleman v. Thompson
... Coleman would be entitled to relief if the "deliberate bypass" standard set forth in Fay v. Noia , 372 U.S. 391, 438-439, still applied, that ...1032 (1983) we provided a partial solution to this problem in the form of a conclusive presumption. Prior to Long, when faced with ambiguous ...
555 U.S. 7 (2008), 07-1239, Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
...The "possibility" standard is too lenient. This Court's frequently reiterated standard requires ... part, plaintiffs assert that they would prevail under any formulation of the irreparable injury standard, because the District Court found that ...
532 U.S. 424 (2001), 99-2035, Cooper Industries, Inc v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.
... Courts of Appeals should apply a de novo standard when reviewing district court determinations of the constitutionality of ...A jury's assessment of the former is essentially a factual determination, but its imposition of the latter ...
369 U.S. 186 (1962), 6, Baker v. Carr
..., they shall be adjoining, and no county shall be divided in forming a district. . Thus, Tennessee's standard for allocating ...
540 U.S. 93 (2003), 02-1674, McConnell v. Federal Election Commission
...standard of review applicable to campaign contribution limits under Buckley and ... indebted to these contributors as they had been to those who had formerly contributed to the national parties. Preventing corrupting activity from ...
570 U.S. 529 (2013), 12-96, Shelby County v. Holder
...Section 2 of. the Act, which bans any "standard, practice, or. procedure" that "results in a denial or abridgement. ...Section 4 of the Act. provides the "coverage formula," defining the. " covered jurisdictions" as States or political. ...
252 U.S. 189 (1920), 318, Eisner v. Macomber
... in each case according to truth and substance, without regard to form. P. 206. Income may be defined as the gain derived from ... On January 1, 1916, the Standard Oil Company of California, a corporation of that state, out of an ...
508 U.S. 49 (1993), 91-1043, Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.
...[ 4 ] . Our original formulation of antitrust petitioning immunity required that unprotected activity lack ... whatever "superficial certainty" it might provide, a subjective standard would utterly fail to supply "real `intelligible guidance.'" Allied Tube, ...
809 F.3d 134 (5th Cir. 2015), 15-40238, Texas v. United States
.... . For MICHAEL BARNES, Former Representative of Maryland, HOWARD BERMAN, Former Representative of .... . findings of fact are subject to a clearly erroneous standard of review, while conclusions of law are subject to broad review and will ...
536 U.S. 639 (2002), 00-1751, Zelman v. Simmons-Harris
...1996). The district had failed to meet any of the 18 state standards for minimal acceptable performance. Only 1 in 10 ninth graders could pass ... we expressly reserved judgment with respect to "a case involving some form of public assistance ( e.g. , scholarships) made available generally ...
- 8 CFR 210.2 - Application for temporary resident status
551 U.S. 701 (2007), 05-908, Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School Dist. No. 1
... system that might prejudice its members' children, an actionable form of injury under the Equal Protection Clause, see, e.g., Adarand ...In order to satisfy this searching standard of review, the school districts must demonstrate that the use of ...
494 U.S. 775 (1990), 88-1685, National Labor Relations Board v. Curtin Matheson Scientific, Inc.
... which Congress set for it, necessarily must have authority to formulate" rules to fill the interstices of the broad statutory provisions. . \xC2"...No. 136 (1989) (slip op. at 10) (the standard for employer polling is the same as the standard for withdrawal of ...
461 U.S. 574 (1983), 81-3, 81-1., Bob Jones University v. U.s.
... that prescribe and enforce racially discriminatory admission standards on the basis of religious doctrine do not qualify as tax-exempt ... on the basis of racial affiliation and association is a form of racial discrimination. Pp. 2034-2035. . No. 81-1, ...
- 49 CFR 571.202 - Standard No. 202; Head restraints; Applicable at the manufacturers option until September 1, 2009
700 F.3d 713 (4th Cir. 2012), 11-5218, United States v. Day
...When one of the newly formed companies won a contract, Day would purchase the necessary parts and have ...As explained below, his claims fail the first prong of this standard", for the jury instruction was not erroneous. A. \xC2"...