hoke v united states
1172 results for hoke v united states
-
vLex Rating
-
875 F.2d 1465 (10th Cir. 1989), 86-2098, O'Rourke v. City of Norman
.... Nos. 86-2098, 86-2219. . United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit . May 23, ... Mann Act which was held constitutional in Hoke v. United States, 227 U.S. 308, 33 S.Ct. 281, 57 ...
-
444 U.S. 865 (1979), 79-40, Hoke v. Board of Medical Examiners of State of North Carolina
...No. 79-40. United" States Supreme Court. October 1, 1979. OPINION. \xC2"...
-
357 F.2d 806 (3rd Cir. 1966), 15529, United States v. Pennsylvania Refuse Removal Ass'n
...Hoke v. United States, 227 U.S. 308, 320, 33 S.Ct. 281, 57 L.Ed. 523 (1913). This is true despite appellants' claim that the refuse was their property. ...
-
114 F.2d 545 (10th Cir. 1940), 2108, Caballero v. Hudspeth
...CABALLERO. v. HUDSPETH, Warden. No. 2108. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. August ...In hoke v. United States, 227 U.S. 308, 320, 33 S.Ct. ...
-
542 F.3d 437 (5th Cir. 2008), 07-10711, Cadles of Grassy Meadows II, L.L.C. v. Goldner
... No. 07-10711. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. ...p[ro]perty.’ " ) (quoting Hoke v. United States, 227 U.S. 308, 320, 33 S.Ct. ...
-
Mann Act
... the constitutionality of the Mann Act in Hoke v. United States, 227 U.S. 308, 33 S. Ct. 281, 57 ...
-
Can the tolling of statutes of limitations based on the defendant's absence from the state ever be consistent with the Commerce Clause?
Most states have legislation that tolls applicable statutes ...(1) In 1988, the United States Supreme Court held in Bendix Autolite ...at 142-43. . (151.) Id. at 143 n.4 (quoting Hoke v. United States, 227 U.S. 308, 320 (1913)). ...
-
206 F. 374 (8th Cir. 1913), 3,751, First Nat. Bank of Anamoose v. United States
...321, 358, 23 Sup.Ct. 321, 47 L.Ed. 492; Hipolite Egg Co. v. United States, 220 U.S. 45, 58, 31 Sup.Ct. 364, 55 L.Ed. 364; and Hoke v. United States, 227 U.S. 308, 33 Sup.Ct. 281, 57 L.Ed. . . ., it is no longer open to contention that the powers of Congress in matters of ...
-
229 F.3d 112 (2nd Cir. 2000), 00-2245, Jones v Stinson
... Docket No. 00-2245. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. October ...Hoke, 90 F.3d 43, 47 (2d Cir. 1996) (quoting United ...
-
78 F.2d 684 (6th Cir. 1935), 7000, United States v. Certain Lands in City of Louisville, Jefferson County, Ky.
...146, 156, 40 S.Ct. 106, 108, 64 L.Ed. 194. Cf. Lottery Case, 188 U.S. 321, 357, 23 S.Ct. 321, 47 L.Ed. 492. In Hoke v. United States, 227 U.S. 308, 33 S.Ct. 281, 57 L.Ed. 523, 43 L. R. A. (N. S.) 906, Ann. Cas. 1913E, 905, it was urged that the Act under review ...
-
64 F.3d 491 (9th Cir. 1995), 94-50315, United States v. Hairston
...Zuniga, 6 F.3d 569, 570 (9th Cir.1993) (citation omitted) (emphasis in original) (quoting United States v. Hoke, 610 F.2d 678, 679 (9th Cir.1980)). In United States v. Ragghianti, 560 F.2d 1376 (9th Cir.1977), we held that " 'when the accused ...
-
169 F.3d 820 (4th Cir. 1999), 96-1814, Brzonkala v. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
... Network, Amici Curiae. . United States of America, Intervenor-Appellant, . and ... . of interstate commerce), with, e.g., Hoke v. United States, 227 U.S. 308, 33 S.Ct. 281, 57 ...
-
160 F.2d 757 (8th Cir. 1947), 13349, Mellor v. United States
...Wilson v. United States, 232 U.S. 563, 34 S.Ct. 347, 58 L.Ed. 728; Hoke v. United States, 227 U.S. 308, 33 S.Ct. 281, 57 L.Ed. 523, 43 L.R.A., N.S., 906, Ann.Cas. 1913E, 905; Athanasaw v. United States, 227 U.s. 326, 33 ...
-
996 F.2d 1442 (2nd Cir. 1993), 525, Washington v. James
.... No. 525, Docket 91-2534. . United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit . June ...See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(c); Grey v. Hoke, 933 F.2d 117, 120 (2d Cir.1991). Because he ...
-
643 F.2d 774 (D.C. Cir. 1980), 77-2012, Simons v. Bellinger
.... No. 77-2012. . United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia ...1975) (legislators); Hoke v. Board of Medical Examiners of State of North ...
-
96 F.2d 734 (6th Cir. 1938), 7616, Bogy v. United States
...v. United States, supra), the white slave traffic (Hoke v. United States, 227 U.S. 308, 33 S.Ct. 281, 57 L.Ed. 523, 43 L.R.A.,N.S., 906, Ann. Cas. 1913E, 905), and traffic in stolen automobiles (Brooks v. ...
-
191 F.3d 188 (2nd Cir. 1999), 98-2382, Strogov v The Attorney Gen. of NY
... Docket No. 98-2382. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. ...Hoke...
-
537 U.S. 889 (2002), 02-5006, Hockaday v. Clark
... v. . Cordelia M. CLARK, Superintendent, Hoke Correctional Institution. . No. 02-5006. ed States Supreme Court. Oct. 7, 2002. ... Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the ...
-
Champion v. Ames 188 U.S. 321 (1903)
...'S reservation of certain powers to the states. A 5?4 Court sustained the act, emphasizing ...UNITED STATES, 1911), the MANN ACT (in HOKE V. UNITED ...
-
67 F.3d 34 (2nd Cir. 1995), 1637, United States v. Pipitone
...Similarly, King v. Hoke, 825 F.2d 720 (2d Cir.1987), and United States v. DeLutro, 617 F.2d 316 (2d Cir.1980), also invoked by Gallina, did not involve an agreement to forgo ...
-
355 F.2d 999 (9th Cir. 1966), 19383, Marshall v. United States
...609, 132 A.L.R. 1430 (1941), overruling Hammer v. Dagenhart, 247 U.S. 251, 38 S.Ct. 629, 62 L.Ed. 1101 (1918). See also discussion in Hoke v. United States, 227 U.S. 308, 321, 33 S.Ct. 281, 57 L.Ed. 523 (1913). III. We next consider the position ...
-
163 F.2d 228 (6th Cir. 1947), 10397, Hemans v. United States
...Hoke v. United States, 227 U.S. 308, 320, 323, 33 S.Ct. 281, 283, 57 L.Ed. 523, 43 L.R.A., N.S., 906, Ann.Cas.1913E, 905. It was pointed out that the ...
-
741 F.2d 1338 (11th Cir. 1984), 83-5613, United States v. Johnson
...See Janoe, supra; United States v. Radowitz, 507 F.2d 109 (3d Cir.1974). Cf. United States v. Hoke, 610 F.2d 678 (9th Cir.1980). Both concluded that the amendment was a matter of form and was thus proper. We agree. None of the reasons for requiring ...
-
237 F.2d 169 (5th Cir. 1956), 15726, Henderson v. United States
...In the language of Mr. Justice McKenna speaking for the Court in Hoke v. United States, 227 U.S 308, 322, 33 S.Ct. 281, 284, 57 L.Ed. 523:. 'Our dual form of government has its perplexities, state ...
-
389 F.2d 895 (5th Cir. 1968), 23828, Martin v. United States
...It is the supreme law of the land, and persons and states are subject to it. Hoke v. United States, 1913, 227 U.S. 308, 33 S.Ct. 281, 57 L.Ed. 523. In short, Section 1084 is valid as applied to the facts of this ...