Supplemental Brief for Appellants

Receive alerts:
by e-mail
E-mail Your information will be added to a database with the sole purpose of serving your subscription. This database is the exclusive property of vLex Networks S.L. and will never be shared with any other company. By sending your request you accept the Data Protection Policy of vLex Networks S.L. I have read and accept the Terms of Use
via RSS

8.987 documents for Supplemental Brief for Appellants

- Roe v. Wade
... Court, upon consideration of affidavits, briefs and arguments of counsel, finds as follows:. Findi...JANE ROE, JOHN DOE, AND MARY DOE, APPELLANTS,. JAMES HUBERT HALLFORD, M.D., APPELLANT-INTERVENO... 191 Note 5 at page 510. Supplemental Brief for Appellants. . In the Supreme Court of t...
- West's Encyclopedia of American Law
- Milestones in the Law
- Universal City Studios, Inc., Paramount Pictures Corporation, Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc., Tristar Pictures, Inc., Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc., Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P., Disney Enterprises Inc., Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Eric Corley, Also Known as Emmanuel Goldstein, and 2600 Enterprises Inc., Defendants-Appellants, United States of America, Intervenor., 273 F.3d 429 (2nd Cir. 2001)
... Found., San Francisco, Cal., on the brief), for Defendants-Appellants. Charles S. Sims, New ...See Supplemental Brief for Appellants at 2, 3. 26 We disagree. Unl...
- Federal Circuits
- Western Air Lines, Inc. v. Board of Equalization of S. D., 480 U.S. 123 (1987)
...Rasenberger argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs were Rachel B. Trinder and... oral argument, we requested supplemental briefing from the parties, and called for the view...
- U.S. Supreme Court

- Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Comm., 525 U.S. 471 (1999)
...With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Waxman, Assistant Attorney ... filed in the court of appeals." Supplemental Brief for Appellants in No. 96-55929 (CA9), p. 2. ...
- U.S. Supreme Court
- The unreviewable executive: Kiyemba, Maqaleh, and the Obama administration.
...Nevertheless, in the same brief in which it urged that the case had become moot, t...In a supplemental brief filed in September 2008, the Bush Administra...(54.) Reply Brief for the Respondents-Appellants at 4, al-Maqaleh v. Gates, No. 09-5265 (D.C. Cir. ...
- Constitutional Commentary
- Vol. 26 Nbr. 3, June 2010
- Cantor v. Detroit Edison Co., 428 U.S. 579 (1976)
...With him on the briefs were Robert A. Holstein, Michael L. Sklar, and Dav... General did not take issue with the appellants' first argument. He contended that the California ... on which the Court had requested supplemental briefing was "whether the state statute involved i...
- U.S. Supreme Court
- Roush v. Butera, (Ohio 2012)
Under R.C. 3937.18, as amended by H.B. 261, once a signed rejection of UM/UIM coverage is produced, the elements of an offer required by Linko v. Indemn. Ins. of N.Am., 90 Ohio St.3d 445, 739 N.E.2d 338 (2000), may be demonstrated by extrinsic evidence. Hollon v. Clary, 104 Ohio St.3d 526, 2004-Ohio-6772, 820 N.E.2d 881; Collateral estoppel not applicable unless the prior judgment is preclusive on both parties; Untimely expert report is not admissible in support of summary judgment unless party producing report obtains leave under Civ.R. 56(F); Additional affidavits may be submitted in support of summary judgment if party obtains leave under Civ.R.56(E).

... W. ROUSH, ET AL. PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS vs. JOANN BUTERA, ET AL. DEFENDANTS-...- 4 -. additional discovery and briefing on the motions for summary judgment, the trial co...- 16 -. Supplemental Evidence {¶39} In the fourth and fif...
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Cantor v. Detroit Edison Co., 428 U.S. 579 (1976)
...With him on the briefs were Robert A. Holstein, Michael L. Sklar, and Dav... General did not take issue with the appellants' first argument. He contended that the California ... on which the Court had requested supplemental briefing was "whether the state statute involved i...
- U.S. Supreme Court
- The Estate of Micheal Keating v. Coatesville VA Med Center, (3rd Cir. 2012)
... Appellants. *(Pursuant to Fed R. App. 12(a... After the deadline for filing their reply brief had lapsed, Appellants filed a motion for leave too file a supplemental appendix and a separate document titled Brief for ...
- Federal Circuits
- Cantor v. Detroit Edison Co., 428 U.S. 579 (1976)
...With him on the briefs were Robert A. Holstein, Michael L. Sklar, and Dav... In his supplemental brief the Attorney General of . [Page 428 U.S. 57... General did not take issue with the appellants' first argument. He contended that the California ...
- U.S. Supreme Court