Remedial Statute

1 similar search for Remedial Statute

remedial statute definition

Receive alerts:
by e-mail
E-mail Your information will be added to a database with the sole purpose of serving your subscription. This database is the exclusive property of vLex Networks S.L. and will never be shared with any other company. By sending your request you accept the Data Protection Policy of vLex Networks S.L. I have read and accept the Terms of Use
via RSS

More than 10.000 documents for Remedial Statute

- Remedial Statute
A law enacted for the purpose of correcting a defect in a prior law, or in order to provide a remedy where none previously existe...
- West's Encyclopedia of American Law
- Po–San
- Jay v. Massachusetts Cas. Ins. Co., (Ohio 2009)
de novo jurisdiction post-trial appellate fees remand remedial statute
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Cleveland Mobile Radio Sales, Inc. v. Verizon Wireless, (Ohio 2005)
REMEDIAL; PENAL; STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS; EXPRESSED STATUTORY LANGUAGE.
- Ohio Supreme Court

- Discount Cellular, Inc. v. Ameritech Mobile Communications, Inc., (Ohio 2005)
REMEDIAL; PENAL; STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS; EXPRESSED STATUTORY LANGUAGE.
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Cosgrove v. Williamsburg of Cincinnati Mgt. Co., Inc., (Ohio 1994)
Employer and employee - Sex discrimination - R.C. 4112.99 is a remedial statute and is subject to R.C. 2305.07's six-year limitations period * * * .
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Florida Dept. of Revenue v. Piccadilly Cafeterias, Inc., 554 U.S. (2008)
... consistent with the principle that a remedial statute should be construed liberally; and that th...
- U.S. Supreme Court
- State ex rel. Smith v. Etheridge, (Ohio 1992)
Schools - Employment of administrators - R.C. 3319.02 is a remedial statute that must be liberally construed in favor of administrators.
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Zahn v. Zahn, (Ohio 2003)
child support, spousal support, abuse of discretion, retroactivity, remedial statute, R.C. 3119.022, change in circumstances, Sup.R. 40(A)
- Ohio Supreme Court
- State v. Goist, (Ohio 2003)
POST CONVICTION RELIEF - R.C. 2953.21; post conviction relief; retroactive application; substantive/remedial statute; vested right; reasonable opportunity; habeas corpus; ex post facto
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Sewell v. State, (Ohio 2009)
SEX OFFENSES CONSTITUTIONAL LAW/CIVIL: Where the petitioner had been classified as a sexually oriented offender under former R.C. Chapter 2950 and had been reclassified by the Attorney General as a Tier III sex offender under Am.Sub.S.B. No. 10 (Senate Bill 10), the trial court did not err in overruling the petitioners constitutional challenges to Senate Bill 10 because the retroactive application of Senate Bill 10s tier-classification and registration requirements does not violate the prohibition on retroactive laws contained in Section 28, Article II of the Ohio Constitution, the Ohio Constitutions Due Process Clause, the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Ohio Constitution, or the separation-of-powers doctrine. The retroactive application...

.... Statutes enacted in Ohio are presumed to be constitutional.... affects a substantive right or is remedial.13 If the statute affects a substantial right, it...
- Ohio Supreme Court