pro hac vice

9 similar searches for pro hac vice

Receive alerts:
by e-mail
E-mail Your information will be added to a database with the sole purpose of serving your subscription. This database is the exclusive property of vLex Networks S.L. and will never be shared with any other company. By sending your request you accept the Data Protection Policy of vLex Networks S.L. I have read and accept the Terms of Use
via RSS

3.041 documents for pro hac vice

- Schmidt v. Krikorian, (Ohio 2012)
Pro hac vice; Final appealable order; Protective Order; Attorney-client privilege.
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Howard E. Pfeifer v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation, Owner or Owner Pro Hac Vice of Barges 1011, 1384, 1400, 1363, and Others in a Fleet, Appellant., 678 F.2d 453 (3rd Cir. 1982)
Jerome M. Libenson (argued), Baskin & Sears, P.C., Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Distri...
- Federal Circuits
- Maryland Court of Appeals Disbars Three Attorneys in One Week
Maryland's top court unanimously ordered the disbarment of three attorneys in separate decisions last week, including one who had listed a UPS mailbox as his law office. The Court of Appeals said Joel D. Joseph engaged in dishonesty when he posed as a Maryland resident to secure pro hac vice admissions in the courts of California, where he actually resided. The Maryland address Joseph gave court personnel -- 4938 Hampden Lane Suite 118, Bethesda, Md. -- was a UPS store.
- The Daily Record (Baltimore)
- November 06, 2011

- in Re Superior Construction Company, Inc., as the Owner Pro Hac Vice of the Vessel, 'Barge Mobro 605,' in a Cause of Action of Exoneration From, or Limitation Of, Liability, Consolidated in Re:-Appellant, v. Charles Brock, Robert Bowers, Et Al., Claimants-Appellees, Jimmie White, Claimant-Consolidated Claimant-Appellee., 445 F.3d 1334 (11th Cir. 2006)
Gary A. Bubb, Gary A. Bubb, P.A., Jacksonville, FL, Mark Hicks, Dinah S. Stein, Hicks & Kneale, P.A., Miami, FL, Brian M. Flaherty, Farah & Farah, P.A...
- Federal Circuits
- MJP debate focuses on pro hac vice rules.
In the name of making it easier for lawyers to practice across state boundaries, The Florida Bar is proposing rule changes that would actually restric...
- Florida Bar News
- March 01, 2005
- Davis v. Marcotte, (Ohio 2011)
The attorney, not being a party to the case, had no standing to appeal the denial of pro hac vice privileges. The Ohio Court of Claims did not abuse its discretion in removing the attorney from the case.
- Ohio Supreme Court
- in Re: in the Matter of the Complaint of Luhr Brothers Inc., as Owner, Pro Hac Vice, Operator And/or Charterer of the M/V Vickie, in a Cause of Exoneration From And/or Limitation of Liability, Civil and Maritime. Luhr Brothers, Inc., as Owner, Pro Hac Vice, Operator And/or Charterer of the M/V Vickie, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Crystal Shipowning, Pte. Limited, Claimant-Appellee., 325 F.3d 681 (5th Cir. 2003)
Frederick William Mahley (argued), Strasburger & Price, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellant. Alan G. Sampson (argued), Benckenstein & Oxford, Beaumo...
- Federal Circuits
- in Re: in the Matter Of: Tetra Applied Technologies L P, as Owner Or, Alternatively Owner Pro Hac Vice of Tetra Rig no 6 for Exoneration From or Limitation of Liability. Tetra Applied Technologies, L.P., as Owner, Or, Alternatively, Owner Pro Hac Vice of Tetra Rig No. 6, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Louisiana Workers Compensation Corp., Et Al., Defendants, Todd J. Leger, Defendant-Appellant., 362 F.3d 338 (5th Cir. 2004)
Christopher Leonard Zaunbrecher, Matthew D. McConnell (argued), Briney & Foret, Lafayette, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee. Richard R. Kennedy (argued), L...
- Federal Circuits
- in the Matter of the Complaint of Lewis & Clark Marine, Inc., as Owner or Owner Pro Hac Vice of the M/V Karen Michelle for Exoneration From or Limitation of Liability, Appellant, v. James F. Lewis, Appellee., 196 F.3d 900 (8th Cir. 1999)
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri[Copyrighted Material Omitted][Copyrighted Material Omitted] Before ...
- Federal Circuits
- in the Matter of the Complaint of Mccarthy Brothers Company/Clark Bridge, as Owner Pro Hac Vice of Barge No. Aeb1 for Exoneration From or Limitation of Liability, Petitioner-Appellant., 83 F.3d 821 (7th Cir. 1996)
Andrew Rothschild (argued), Lewis, Rice & Fingersh, St. Louis, MO, for McCarthy Brothers Company/Clark Bridge. Roy C. Dripps, Gail Renshaw (argued), ...
- Federal Circuits