-
Fenwick Employment Brief - May 2012
In Kirby v. Immoos Fire Protection, Inc., the California Supreme Court determined that a party prevailing on a...
-
Section 505 of the Copyright Act provides that, in a copyright infringement action, the court may "in its discretion" award costs to a prevailing part...
-
Section 505 of the Copyright Act provides that, in a copyright infringement action, the court may "in its discretion" award costs to a prevailing part...
-
Attorney Fees, Prevailing Party, Summary Judgment, Deed Restriction.
-
Arbitration clauses in contractual arrangements are fairly standard today. By agreeing to arbitrate, the parties to an arbitration agreement waive their rights to seek redress of their claims in a court in favor of an arbitration tribunal. While litigation is criticized as being expensive and time-consuming, costs associated with arbitration are far from inconsequential. If the parties have waived their right to go to court, even in situations in which fees and costs may be awarded to the prevailing party, and if arbitration costs are cost-prohibitive, could there be a defense to the arbitration contract on grounds of unconcionability? This paper explores situations in which such an argument could be successful, and suggests ways to apportion costs that would make arbitration clauses le...
-
Fenwick Employment Brief - May 2012
In Kirby v. Immoos Fire Protection, Inc., the California Supreme Court determined that a party prevailing on a c...
-
-
C., Inc., doing business as Dirt Cheap Cigarettes and Beer v. State ex rel. Vincent, et al. (MLW No. 61533/Case No. 09-3847 - 8 pages) (U.S. Court of Ap-peals, 8th Circuit, Wollman, J.)
Civil Practice: Attorney's Fees - Prevailing Party - Cigarette Seizure
-
Originally published May 24, 2010 The U.S. Supreme Court ruled today in Hardt v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company, Case. No 09-448 (May 24, ...
-
Under the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Buckhannon Board and Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dep't of Health and Human Resources, which was not a FOIA case, claimants were required to be the "prevailing party" before attorney's fees could be awarded. Magistrate Judge Alan Kay noted that under Bradley v. School Board of the City of Richmond, courts are to apply the law in effect at the time it renders its decision, unless doing so would result in manifest injustice, or is statutorily prohibited.