-
In January 2010, the New Jersey State Legislature amended New Jersey's "Statute of Frauds" and for the first time, requires that all agreements for su...
-
Cohabitation is no longer an "indispensable element" of a palimony claim, the New Jersey Supreme Court has ruled. For a digest of the New Jersey Appellate Division's opinion in this case, see "Palimony not available in absence of cohabitation," Lawyers USA, April 23, 2007. Search terms for Lawyers USA website: Devaney and palimony.
The plaintiff began working for the defendant, who was married, and they soon embarked on 20-year intimate relationship based on the defendant's promise he would divorce his wife and have a child with the plaintiff.
-
OBITUARIES
'Palimony' figure Michelle Marvin
-
In January 2010, the New Jersey State Legislature amended New Jersey's "Statute of Frauds" and for the first time, requires that all agreements for su...
-
Cohabitation is a prerequisite for a palimony claim, and therefore a woman can't sue to enforce a promise of lifetime support from a man with whom she had a 70-year relationship, because the couple never lived together, the New Jersey Appellate Division has ruled.
Despite being married to other people, the parties engaged in a 70-year relationship. In addition to buying the plaintiff real estate and gifts, the defendant paid her and her daughter a monthly stipend until his children took over his finances.
-
This article addresses the cuirent statu and futureof"palimony," court ordered payments fallowing the dissolution of a nanmarital cohabitational relat...
-
... presided over a trial and appeal in a palimony suit that Connell had filed against Diehl after th...
-
NEWARK Two people don't have to live together for one to be eligible for palimony when the relationship ends, the state Supreme Court ruled Tuesday.
Even so, New Jersey's highest court rejected the bid of a woman to collect from a married man with whom she had a 20-year affair, finding the couple did not have a marital-type relationship.
-
Even though a man and a woman had a 20 year relationship and attempted to have a baby together, the woman could not sue for palimony because the parties never cohabited, the New Jersey Appellate Division has ruled.
The couple met at work. Throughout their relationship, the man was married to someone else. They never lived together. At one point the woman grew tired of the man's failure to obtain a divorce and moved across the country. He paid her expenses and went to visit her six or seven times over two and one-half years.
-
LOS ANGELES -- Divorce lawyer Marvin M. Mitchelson, who pioneered the legal revolution known as "palimony" and represented scores of Hollywood clients in high-profile, big-money marital disputes, has died. He was 76.
Mitchelson died Saturday after a battle against cancer at the Rehabilitation Center of Beverly Hills, his longtime publicist Sy Presten said Sunday.