Nunc Pro Tunc

8 similar searches for Nunc Pro Tunc

Receive alerts:
by e-mail
E-mail Your information will be added to a database with the sole purpose of serving your subscription. This database is the exclusive property of vLex Networks S.L. and will never be shared with any other company. By sending your request you accept the Data Protection Policy of vLex Networks S.L. I have read and accept the Terms of Use
via RSS

4.586 documents for Nunc Pro Tunc

- Federal Circuit Law Governs Patent Assignment Interpretation and Nunc Pro Tunc Assignments Cannot Retroactively Confer Standing.
Last Month at the Federal Circuit - December 2010 Judges: Newman (dissenting), Gajarsa (author), and Linn [Appealed from D.N.J., Judge Pisano] In ...
- Mondaq Business Briefing
- Nbr. 2011, January 2011
- Nunc Pro Tunc
[Latin, Now for then.] When courts take some action nunc pro tunc, that action has retroactive legal effect, as though it ...
- West's Encyclopedia of American Law
- Mc–Pl
- Federal Circuit Law Governs Patent Assignment Interpretation and Nunc Pro Tunc Assignments Cannot Retroactively Confer Standing
Last Month at the Federal Circuit - December 2010 Judges: Newman (dissenting), Gajarsa (author), and Linn [Appealed from D.N.J., Judge Pisano] ...
- Mondaq Business Briefing
- United States Law Articles in English

- State v. Marcum, (Ohio 2011)
Nunc Pro Tunc. Aggravated Murder/Venue.
- Ohio Supreme Court
- State v. Qualls (Slip Opinion), Slip Opinion No. 2012-Ohio-1111
Criminal lawPostrelease controlWhen a defendant is notified about postrelease control at the sentencing hearing, but notification is inadvertently omitted from the sentencing entry, the omission can be corrected with a nunc pro tunc entry and the defendant is not entitled to a new sentencing hearing.
- Ohio Supreme Court
- State v Miley, (Ohio 2011)
Nunc Pro Tunc Entry
- Ohio Supreme Court
- State v. Pettyjohn, (Ohio 2011)
post-release control, final appealable order, Crim.R. 32(C), jurisdiction, nunc pro tunc.
- Ohio Supreme Court
- State v. Harris, (Ohio 2011)
Postrelease control; nunc pro tunc; Crim.R. 36; clerical error
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Robinson v. Target Corp., (Ohio 2011)
Amended commission order allowed 60-day time limit to commence on date of amended order. Amended order was not literally a "nunc pro tunc" entry for purposes of Perfection Stove v. Scherer
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Moore v. Moore, (Ohio 2011)
CIV.R. 60(B); FINAL JUDGMENT; NUNC PRO TUNC; CIV.R. 60(A); MISTAKE; ATTORNEY FEES; R.C. 3105.73(A).
- Ohio Supreme Court