-
Joseph V. Pinto, (argued), Evan S. Eisner, Robert Toland, II, White and Williams, Philadelphia, PA, John M. Thomas, Ford Motor Company, Office of Gene...
-
Olmstead was also hired by Bill Cosby when his son Ennis was murdered in 1997 and also worked on the JonBenet Ramsey case. "Since my daughter's disappearance I have exhausted my savings and reduced my method of living severely," confesses Richardson. According to US law, in the absence of children, the next of kin title falls to the persons in question: parents, father, then mother.
-
- Karen L. Hokansen, Fka Karen L. Neil; Cecile Lou Browning, Heir-At-Law and Next of Kin of Aimee Uffner, Deceased Minor, Cecile Lou Browning, Successor To Randall J. Price, Special Administrator of the Estate of Aimee Uffner, Deceased; Amalia R. Zapata; and Amalia R. Zapata, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. United States of America, Defendant/Appellee., 868 F.2d 372 (10th Cir. 1989)
Roger M. Theis, Render & Kamas, Wichita, Kan. (Paul L. Thomas, Render & Kamas and Andrew W. Hutton, Michaud, Cordry, Michaud, Hutton & Hutton, Wichita...
-
-
- Agnes Lunsford, as Special Administratrix of the Estates of Theophil Gall and Alice H. Gall, Deceased, Agnes Lunsford and Carol O'Brien as the Sole Heirs At Law and Next of Kin of Theophil Gall, Alice H. Gall and of Norvel Gall, Deceased, E. F. Lodmell, Jr., as Executor of the Estates of E. F. Lodmell and Anna R. Lodmell, Deceased, E. F. Lodmell, Jr., and Leeann Emme as the Sole Heirs At Law and Next of Kin of E. F. Lodmell and Anna R. Lodmell, Deceased, Appellants, v. United States of America, Appellee., 570 F.2d 221 (8th Cir. 1977)
Horace R. Jackson, Rapid City, S.D., for appellants; Sam W. Masten and Jeff Masten, Canton, S.D., on brief.
Thomas J. Whalen, New York City, for app...
-
The next of kin of a decedent upon whom an autopsy has been performed do not have a protected right under Ohio law in the decedent’s tissues, organs, blood, or other body parts that have been removed and retained by the coroner for forensic examination and testing.
-
According to , Rev. Rul. 54-379 concludes that heirs at law, next of kin, or beneficiaries who are distributees of a person who dies intestate under state law have a material interest to receive the decedent's return information. The statute does not clearly address the application of the material interest standard in the context of a taxpayer who dies intestate.
-
In this slumping economy, North Jersey cemetery and funeral directors say more people are choosing cremation over more costly burials. But when an indigent dies, burial is the only alternative.
Counties by law must pay to dispose of the bodies of people who have no next of kin to make funeral arrangements. They're also required by law to bury unclaimed bodies rather than choose a less expensive cremation -- despite lopsided costs and an increase in indigent cases.
-
- Citibank, N.A., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nyland (Cf8) Ltd., New York Land Company A/K/a Great Neckers Realty, Inc., the Republic of the Philippines, the City of New York, the New York City Department of Finance, the People of the State of New York, the United States of America and John Doe # 1 Through John Doe # 900 Inclusive, the Names of the Last 900 Defendants Being Fictitious, the True Names of Said Defendants Being Unknown To Plaintiff, It Being Intended To Designate Any Subtenants of the Mortgaged Premises Who Are in Default of the Payment of Rent for Which a Proceeding is Now Pending Brought By the Mortgagor And/or Other Persons or Parties Having or Claiming an Interest in or a Lien Upon the Mortgaged Premises Subordinate To that of the Mortgagee, If the Aforesaid Individual Defendants Are Living, and If Any or all of Said Individual Defendants Be Dead, Their Heirs At Law, Next of Kin, Distributees, Executors, Administrators, Trustees, Committees, Devisees, Legatees and the Assignees, Lienors,..., 839 F.2d 93 (2nd Cir. 1988)
Robert M. Abrahams, New York City (Schulte Roth & Zabel, New York City, Alan R. Glickman, Mark E. Kaplan, Sherry K. Cohen, of counsel), for plaintiff-...
-
AUSTIN, Texas -- I write about the Terry Schiavo case both as one who has personally confronted the "pull the plug" question on several levels in recent years and as a staggered observer of this festival of political hypocrisy, opportunism and the trashing of constitutional law, common sense and common decency.
Look, the fundamental question in such cases is, "Who decides?" Preferably, the dying themselves, with a living will. In this case, evidence that Terry Schiavo did not want her life continued in its current pitiable state has been offered and accepted in several courts of law. Next, the next-of-kin, though in many cases someone else may be closer to the dying person, such as a longtime lover, and should be legally designated to make the decision through power of attorney.