new jersey vs tlo

8 similar searches for new jersey vs tlo

Receive alerts:
by e-mail
E-mail Your information will be added to a database with the sole purpose of serving your subscription. This database is the exclusive property of vLex Networks S.L. and will never be shared with any other company. By sending your request you accept the Data Protection Policy of vLex Networks S.L. I have read and accept the Terms of Use
via RSS

30 documents for new jersey vs tlo

- Random, suspicionless drug testing of high school athletes.
The Supreme Court ruling in Vernonia School District 47J v. Acton that random drug testing of high school student athletes without probable cause was constitutional because participation in extracurricular athletics means these students can expect less privacy was reached for policy reasons and was misguided. The policy goal of decreasing drug use among American youth does not justify robbing students of their privacy.

... The Court first adopted such a test in New Jersey v. T.L.0.(44) In T.L.O., a principal searched a st...
- Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
- Vol. 86 Nbr. 4, June 1996
- Freeman vs. City of Dallas, (5th Cir. 2001)
...at 71, 113 S. Ct. at 549, (quoting New Jersey v. T.L.O. , 469 U.S. 325, 341, 105 S. Ct. 733, 742...
- Federal Circuits
- Joelis Jardines, Petitioner, vs. State of Florida, Respondent, (2011)
... stops short of probable cause.” New Jersey v. T.L.O., 469 U.S. 325, 341 (1985). Yet a carefu...
- Florida Supreme Court

- Should the Supreme Court stop inviting amici curiae to defend abandoned lower court decisions?
...617, 617 (1988) (per curiam); New Jersey v. T.L.O., 468 U.S. 1214 (1984) (mem.). . (140.) S...
- Stanford Law Review
- Vol. 63 Nbr. 4, April 2011
- Nelson vs. Dretke, (5th Cir. 2006)
...Ct. 1227, 1232 (1990) and New Jersey v. T.L.O., 469 U.S. 325, 345, 105 S. Ct. 733, 744 ...
- Federal Circuits
- Torture in the eyes of the beholder: the psychological difficulty of defining torture in law and policy.
... Waldron, supra note 7, at 1692 (citing New Jersey v. T.L.O., 469 U.S. 325, 379 n.21 (1985)). . (147....
- Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
- Vol. 44 Nbr. 1, January 2011
- Fortuity and forensic familial identification.
...New Jersey simply did not respond. . Forty-one jurisdictions ...
- Stanford Law Review
- Vol. 63 Nbr. 4, April 2011
- Educational issues and judicial oversight.
... the bellwether of state initiatives, New Jersey's contribution was more inclusive, and the consequ...
- Albany Law Review
- Vol. 71 Nbr. 4, September 2008
- Campbell vs. McAlister, (5th Cir. 1998)
...47J v. Acton , 515 U.S. 646 (1995); New Jersey v. T.L.O. , 469 U.S. 325 (1985). In doing so, the ...
- Federal Circuits
- Hudson and Samson: The Roberts Court Confronts Privacy, Dignity, and the Fourth Amendment
Introduction. I. Categorical Exclusion Of Parolees From Fourth Amendment Protection: Samson V. California. A. Background Probationer´s Rights Under the Fourth Amendment. B. Samson v. California. 1. The Majority Opinion. 2. The Dissent. C. Critiquing Justice Thomas´ Opinion. 1. The Court Assumes, Without Evidence or Analysis, That Suspicionless Searches Deter Effective Monitoring of Parolees. 2. The "Continuum" Theory of Privacy Remains Undeveloped by the Court. 3. Despite the Court´s Insistence, Samson Allows for Arbitrary and Capricious Searches of Parolees. 4. What Happened to the Special Needs Doctrine?. II. Taking On The Exclusionary Rule: Hudson V. Michigan. A. Existing Exceptions to the Exclusionary Rule. B. Hudson v. Michigan-The Frontal Assault on the Exclusionary Rule Beg...

... requirements impracticable (quoting New Jersey v. T.L.O., 469 U.S. 325, 351 (1985) (Blackmun, J.,...
- Louisiana Law Review
- Nbr. 68-1, October 2007