-
WASHINGTON (AP) - President Bush and British Prime Minister Tony Blair declared Friday that a multinational force should be dispatched quickly to help Lebanon regain control of the southern part of its country from the Hezbollah militia.
However, the two leaders again stopped short of supporting an immediate cease-fire in the fighting between Hezbollah and Israel, which Arab and European leaders have been urging.
-
Israeli leaders yesterday said for the first time that they would consider the deployment of a NATO-led multinational force in Lebanon to monitor a cease-fire with Hezbollah, as diplomats increased their efforts to halt the escalating crisis in the Middle East.
In Washington yesterday, President Bush and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice met with top Saudi Arabian officials before Miss Rice's trip to try to seek an end to the conflict that began after Hezbollah captured two Israeli soldiers on July 12.
-
Multinational force depends upon cease-fire
The debate on a multinational intervention in Lebanon has recently intensified due to a stall in the conflict, with neither of the two combatants able to reach their objectives.
-
... to the introduction of United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminen... units of the other nations of the multinational force involved in enforcement of sanctions, limits... [this chapter]." MULTINATIONAL FORCE IN LEBANON RESOLUTION Pub. L. 98-119, Oct. 12, 1983, 97 Stat....
-
As a former member of the multinational peacekeeping force for Lebanon, the violence between Hezbollah and Israel leaves me shaking my head in disgust ("Israel moves to seal off Lebanon," Page 1, Friday).
Both sides attack each other in the least manly of ways, air assaults and missiles, while recklessly endangering innocent civilians. For me, this whole conflict involving the parent of all terrorist organizations means we in the world of powerful military might have failed. Failed in the matter of finishing off Hezbollah, the one enduring enemy of peace throughout the Middle East.
-
... to review presidential unilateral uses of force since 1973 is to find a spirit of compliance with ...Grenada B. Lebanon C. Libya D. The Persian Gulf E. Panama F. Somalia ... in sending 800 marines to join a multinational force with the task of keeping the peace "in an in...
-
For more than 200 years, the United States has sent its soldiers and sailors to the Middle East to fight in various conflicts. Whether the goal was to end piracy, fight Nazism, rescue American hostages, liberate Kuwait or defeat terrorism, the U.S. has been willing to commit men and matEriel in order to protect its interests in North Africa, Somalia, the Levant, the Arabian Peninsula, Iraq, Iran and Afghanistan. Today is not a day to debate the merits of those interventions, but to honor those killed while serving thousands of miles away from their families. On this Memorial Day, I'd like to remember those American soldiers who made the ultimate sacrifice for their country while serving in the Middle East.
To the soldiers who fought in the First Barbary War (1801-1805) against the Barba...
... who fought in Operation Blue Bat in Lebanon (1958) in order to protect a pro-Western governmen...To the soldiers who served in the Multinational Force in Lebanon (1982-1984) in order to restore s...
-
..." who give voice to a variety of competing forces at work in a single moment of rhetorical action. I... Middle East 268 Reagan 09/20/82 New Multinational Force 1,273 in Lebanon 269 Reagan 10/13/82 Economy...
-
... for the deployment of Lebanese armed forces to all parts of the country and the disarming of a... . Will the multinational force in Lebanon be deployed before Hezbollah is d...
-
By David Irvine
The Daily Dispatch of Henderson
...She took part in the multinational peacekeeping force in Lebanon in addition to other...