motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim
-
-
Legal malpractice; statute of limitations; Civ.R. 12(B)(6) motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; test for identifying a cognizable event.
-
CIVIL- motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim; Civ.R. 12(B)(6); fraud; fraudulent inducement; invited error; plain error; parol evidence; extrinsic evidence; standing; corporate standing; separate and distinct injury
-
Baltimore County's lawsuit against several online hotel booking companies for allegedly unpaid hotel-room occupancy taxes has survived a motion to dismiss in U.S. District Court in Baltimore.
Judge Marvin J. Garbis granted in part and denied in part the defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. The judge dismissed the unjust enrichment claim because the plaintiff failed to plead that it conferred a benefit on the defendant, as required under Maryland law.
-
ORIGINAL ACTION - writ of mandamus; R.C. 2731.01; motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim; Civ.R. 12(B)(6); plain and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law; direct appeal; judicial notice
-
This article addresses the role of dispositive motions have in arbitration. For purposes of this article, dispositive motions are motions that would be considered dispositive by a court, such as a motion for summary judgment, a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, a motion for judgment on the pleadings, and a motion to strike particular claims or defenses. In arbitration, these motions are considered under the general rubric of "summary dispositions" or "partial summary dispositions." The 10th Circuit has said that a fundamentally fair arbitration hearing requires only notice, opportunity to be heard and to present relevant and material evidence and argument before the decision makers. Dispositive motions have the potential to play an important role in resolving disputes in a...
-
The trial court did not err in granting a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim where the sole allegation in the complaint is prohibited pursuant to the witness immunity doctrine.
-
Esquinance claimed that he faced a choice between joining the union, which required the use of his money for political purposes he detested, such as the promotion of abortion and homosexual rights, or refraining from joining the union and losing the ability to have any input into his working conditions because only union members possess certain rights, such as voting to ratify the collective bargaining agreement between the union and the Polk County School Board.8 The defendants filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim for which relief may be granted, and the trial court granted the motion.9 The Tennessee legislature authorized professional employee organizations to bargain collectively as the representative of professional employees with local boards of education by pas...
-
Trial courts judgment granting of defendants motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Civ.R. 12(B)(6) is affirmed. Plaintiff failed to set forth facts in support of their claim that would entitle them to relief when the settlement agreement their complaint was based on was never executed by the parties and any benefit provided for in the agreement was discretionary.
-
... UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS. FOR THE T... On July 16, 2009, defendants filed a motion to dismiss. On March 9, 2010, the District Court g... that Armbruster had failed to state a claim as a matter of law. Judge Jones determined ...=s order granting a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. Gelman v. State Farm Mut. Auto. ...