© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
- Language
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
motion to dismiss; Civ.R. 12 (B)(6); matters outside the pleadings; convert to motion for summary judgment
motion to dismiss; Civ.R. 12(B)(6); convert; summary judgment; judicial notice; prior proceedings; savings statute; time-barred
... District Court's decision granting the motion to dismiss filed by Universal Underwriters Insura...§ 1291. . We exercise plenary review over a distri... to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), for failure to state a claim. Grief v. . Klem, 5...
Motion to dismiss, Civ.R. 12(B)(6), immunity, R.C. 2744.02(A), political subdivision, de novo.
Summary judgment; mortgage foreclosure: The trial court properly granted summary judgment in favor of mortgage assignee on its foreclosure complaint. Property owners did not dispute that the promissory note was in default. Their speculative claims that the mortgage assignee had been made whole as a result of the default through the United States government's Troubled Asset Relief Program and other government funds were insufficient to defeat summary judgment. Motion to dismiss; Civ.R. 12(B)(6): The trial court improperly dismissed property owners' counterclaims alleging a violation of the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act and to quiet title where the court relied exclusively on a previous order issued in the case. The court was required to convert the motion into one for summary ...
Res judicata may not be raised by motion to dismiss pursuant to Civ.R. 12(B)(6). Civ.R. 8(F); merits of res judicata defense not reached.
PROCEDURE/RULES CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS DEBTOR/CREDITOR: Claims of unconscionability involve questions of both law and fact that generally cannot be decided on a motion to dismiss filed under Civ.R. 12(B)(6). A res judicata defense may not be raised in a motion to dismiss under Civ.R. 12(B)(6), but instead must be raised in a summary-judgment motion. The trial court properly dismissed a claim for fraud when the claim was filed beyond the applicable four-year limitations period, and when the complaint did not contain any allegations that would have extended the filing time. The trial court properly dismissed a claim for breach of fiduciary duty when no fiduciary relationship existed between the parties, who had no more than an ordinary debtor/creditor relationship in a commercial con...
CIVIL- motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim; Civ.R. 12(B)(6); fraud; fraudulent inducement; invited error; plain error; parol evidence; extrinsic evidence; standing; corporate standing; separate and distinct injury
Trial court did not err in granting appellee's Civ.R. 12(B)(6) motion to dismiss.
Legal malpractice; statute of limitations; Civ.R. 12(B)(6) motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; test for identifying a cognizable event.
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company