month-to-month tenancy

Receive alerts:
by e-mail
E-mail Your information will be added to a database with the sole purpose of serving your subscription. This database is the exclusive property of vLex Networks S.L. and will never be shared with any other company. By sending your request you accept the Data Protection Policy of vLex Networks S.L. I have read and accept the Terms of Use
via RSS

324 documents for month-to-month tenancy

- Landlord didn't properly terminate month-to-month tenancy.
- New York Landlord v. Tenant
- Vol. 26 Nbr. 1, September 2010
- Tower Realty v. Zalenski, (Ohio 2008)
Contract dispute over unpaid rent; summary judgment; lease was defectively executed, creating a month-to-month tenancy; R.C. 5321.17 does not apply to commercial leases; lessee did not owe rent for August when month-to-month lease was terminated in June.
- Ohio Supreme Court
- City Mgt. Sys., Inc. v. Blakeley, (Ohio 2003)
lease – res judicata – month to month tenancy – motion to dismiss – summary judgment – Civ.R. 56
- Ohio Supreme Court

- Lease Is Up, Tenant Still There What Now?
My commercial lease ended, but I am continuing to pay rent and occupy the space I had leased. What are my rights and obligations? When your lease expired but you continued to remain in the premises, you became a hold-over tenant. Your continued payment of rent increases your rights as a holdover tenant, assuming that your landlord has been cashing your rent checks. Under New Jersey law, a tenancy-at-will has been created. If the term of your original lease was longer than one month, you are deemed to a month-to-month tenancy. In other words, you have a lease term of one month at a time under terms identical to your original lease. Your lease will continue to renew automatically every month, unless you or your landlord takes steps to terminate the month-to-month tenancy.
- The Record, Bergen County, NJ
- August 12, 2008
- Peoples v. Holley, (Ohio 2009)
Appellant contends that enforcement of the parties oral lease agreement is barred by the Statute of Frauds. He also contends that the manifest weight of the evidence does not support finding him liable for two claims of conversion or the total damage award. The trial court did not enforce the parties oral lease agreement but rather enforced Appellants obligation to pay rent under an implied-in-law, month-to-month tenancy. There is competent, credible evidence to support the findings of liability and the damage award. Judgment affirmed.
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Fitch Affirms Jackson Municipal Airport Authority's Airport Revs at 'A-'; Outlook Stable.
... agreement which provides month to month tenancy, giving either party the ability to cancel the agr...
- Business Wire
- July 11, 2011
- in Re Peggy A. Miller, Debtor. Peggy A. Miller, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Chateau Communities, Inc., Defendant-Appellant., 282 F.3d 874 (6th Cir. 2002)
... bankruptcy filing upon her month-to-month tenancy with defendant. The resolution of this dispute cen...
- Federal Circuits
- Landlord can't sue former tenant for additional rent.
...The month-to-month tenancy continued on the same terms as the expired lease. ...
- New York Landlord v. Tenant
- Vol. 26 Nbr. 11, July 2011
- Court dismisses 'Stuy Town defence'.
... he was terminating the month-to-month tenancy. . That August, the landlord and the tenants enter...
- Real Estate Weekly
- January 19, 2011
- Leases and Rental Agreements
... renew but is converted into a tenancy from month-to-month Limit 1½ months’ rent; inte...
- National Survey of State Laws
- Real Estate Laws