mistake of fact contract

Receive alerts:
by e-mail
E-mail Your information will be added to a database with the sole purpose of serving your subscription. This database is the exclusive property of vLex Networks S.L. and will never be shared with any other company. By sending your request you accept the Data Protection Policy of vLex Networks S.L. I have read and accept the Terms of Use
via RSS

More than 10.000 documents for mistake of fact contract

- Dragway 42, L.L.C. v. Kokosing Constr. Co., Inc., (Ohio 2010)
plain error, jury instructions, failure to object, mistake of fact, differing site conditions, breach of contract
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Fairfax Homes, Inc. v. Blue Belle, Inc., (Ohio 2008)
Mutual mistake of material fact not demonstrated to set aside contract.
- Ohio Supreme Court
- 27 CFR 70.482 - Offers in compromise of liabilities (other than forfeiture) under 26 U.S.C.
... of assets by the taxpayer, or mutual mistake of a material fact sufficient to cause a contract ...
- Code of Federal Regulations - Title 27: Alcohol, Tobacco Products and Firearms

- Roberts Auto Ctr., Inc. v. Helmick, (Ohio 2003)
lease agreement – option to purchase – deed – owner – co-owner – summary judgment – agent – contract – mutual mistake of fact – meeting of the minds – void
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Court Of Appeal Clarifies And Restates Test For Repudiatory Breach Of Contract.
... of the sale contract, and then, mistakenly, treated the contract as at an end prior to the ex..., stating that it was 15 December when, in fact, it should have been 19 December 2008. Mr. Heaney ...
- Mondaq Business Briefing
- Nbr. 2011, January 2011
- Nofzinger v. Blood, (Ohio 2003)
The trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding that the parties made a mutual mistake of law and fact in believing that they had entered into a land installment contract; the trial court did not err in concluding that the contracts were not land installment contracts and in concluding that there was no meeting of the minds regarding the boundaries of the property; because there was no valid, enforceable contract, the doctrines of part performance and estoppel were inapplicable. land installment contract; forcible entry and detainer; mutual mistake; meeting of the minds; estoppel; fair rental value; land contract purchase agreement; witness credibility; abuse of discretion; contract; doctrine of part performance; rescission; out of pocket expenditures; benefit of the bargain; sp...
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Mistake and disclosure in a model of two-sided informational inputs.
... examine some theoretical aspects of contractual nondisclosure and the related doctrine of unilater... cases, the disparity can be explained by the fact that one party knows something the other doesn't k...
- Missouri Law Review
- Vol. 73 Nbr. 3, June 2008
- Florida Dept. of State v. Treasure Salvors, Inc., 458 U.S. 670 (1982)
...Contracts were then entered into between the Florida Divisio...Neither the fact that the State elected to defend on behalf of the ... were executed on the basis of a mistaken understanding concerning the ownership of the Atoc...
- U.S. Supreme Court
- Contracts
... binding force of a contract is based on the fact that it evinces a meeting of minds of two parties ... Mistake in sending offer If an intermediary, such as a te...
- West's Encyclopedia of American Law
- Com–Dor
- Dairyland Power Cooperative, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the United States, Defendant-Appellee., 16 F.3d 1197 (Fed. Cir. 1994)
... liability barred Dairyland's claim for contract damages and that the absence of mutual mistake of fact barred Dairyland's claim for contract reformation....
- Federal Circuits