Respondents Industrial Commission's and City of Parma's objections to the magistrate's decision recommending the granting of a writ of mandamus. The commission retains jurisdiction to consider claimant's right to permanent total disability compensation based upon (1) new and changed circumstances; (2) fraud; (3) clear mistake of fact; (4) clear mistake of law; and (5) error by inferior tribunal. The failure of the staff hearing officer to address the impact of relator's admitted drug trafficking on the bureau's right to recover paid PTD benefits was a mistake of fact and law which authorized the commission to exercise continuing juridiction. Writ denied.
...the persons or things to be seized." The fact that the application adequately described those th... be characterized as a mere technical mistake or typographical error. Rather, in the space set a...
Workers Compensation. Modification of a claimant's average weekly wage. To invoke the continuing jurisdiction of the commission under R.C. 4123.52, there must be (1) new and changed circumstance; (2) fraud; (3) clear mistake of fact; (4) clear mistake of law; or (5) error by an inferior tribunal. Newly acquired evidence is not necessarily evidence of new and changed circumstances needed to invoke the commission's continuing jurisdiction. There is a requirement that a party exercise due diligence to discover evidence of new or changed circumstances. Due to the continuing jurisdiction of the commission, the doctrine of res judicata has limited application in industrial cases. Where there is an identity of parties and an identity of issues, res judicata may bar relitigation of a motion to ...
... judgment for Purnell, we recount the facts in the light most favorable to the non-movant, H... was unreasonable (i.e., that Purnell's mistake in using the Glock rather than the Taser was unrea...
... claims: A court must decide (1) whether the facts alleged or shown by the plaintiff make out a viola... the government official’s error is “a mistake of law, a mistake of fact, or a mistake based on m...
... judgment for Purnell, we recount the facts in the light most favorable to the non-movant, H... was unreasonable (i.e., that Purnell's mistake in using the Glock rather than the Taser was unrea...
... judgment for Purnell, we recount the facts in the light most favorable to the non-movant, H... was unreasonable (i.e., that Purnell's mistake in using the Glock rather than the Taser was unrea...
... judgment for Purnell, we recount the facts in the light most favorable to the non-movant, H... was unreasonable (i.e., that Purnell's mistake in using the Glock rather than the Taser was unrea...
... judgment for Purnell, we recount the facts in the light most favorable to the non-movant, H... was unreasonable (i.e., that Purnell's mistake in using the Glock rather than the Taser was unrea...
... judgment for Purnell, we recount the facts in the light most favorable to the non-movant, H... was unreasonable (i.e., that Purnell's mistake in using the Glock rather than the Taser was unrea...
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other interesting searches:
Lawrence Schlemmer | Richard Quest | joint action routines | asset protection jobs | Stone County | ley penal tributaria peruana | precio azucar noviembre 2008 | Capital extranjero en el porfiriato | rinuncia alla rivalsa
