miranda vs arizona background

Receive alerts:
by e-mail
E-mail Your information will be added to a database with the sole purpose of serving your subscription. This database is the exclusive property of vLex Networks S.L. and will never be shared with any other company. By sending your request you accept the Data Protection Policy of vLex Networks S.L. I have read and accept the Terms of Use
via RSS

205 documents for miranda vs arizona background

- Police interrogation of juveniles: an empirical study of policy and practice.
... circumstances"--to gauge their waivers of Miranda rights and the voluntariness of confessions. Inter.... (12) Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). Although the Court has not e... juvenile's age, experience, education, background, and intelligence, and into whether he has the cap...
- Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
- Vol. 97 Nbr. 1, September 2006
- USA v. Michael Cavazos, (5th Cir. 2012)
... FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On September 1, 2010, between 5:30 a.m. and ... Cavazos without reading him his Miranda rights. . About five minutes into the initia...1988) (quoting Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 479 (1966)). “A suspect is . . . ...
- Federal Circuits
- Countermajoritarian hero or zero? Rethinking the Warren Court's role in the criminal procedure revolution.
...Ohio, (19) Gideon v. Wainwright, (20) Miranda v. Arizona, (21) Katz v. United States, (22) and T... requires understanding the doctrinal background against which it was decided. Though the Supreme C...
- University of Pennsylvania Law Review
- Vol. 152 Nbr. 4, April 2004

- State v. Lynn, (Ohio 2011)
Suppress confession because Miranda rights were not intelligently waived, specifically the right to remain silent; deference to the trial courts credibility determination; Police coercion not needed to find that the Miranda rights were not intelligently waived.

...Arizona (1966), 384 U.S. 436, 475 and Connelly, 479 U...
- Ohio Supreme Court
- State v. Edwards, (Ohio 2011)
MIRANDA EVIDENCE CRIM. MISCELLANEOUS: The trial court properly denied the defendants motion to suppress statements made to police while he was being interviewed at a hospital: a reasonable person in the defendants position would have felt free to leave at any time during the interview, and the defendant was therefore not subjected to a custodial interrogation for purposes of Miranda v. Arizona (1966), 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602. The trial court properly granted in part and denied in part the defendants motion to suppress statements made during an interrogation at a police station: after being advised of his rights, the defendant failed to clearly and unambiguously assert his right to remain silent under Miranda until he stated to police, Im just through with talking, man. ...

...�testimony detailing the factual background of the abusive incident involving Edwards’s other...
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Should the Supreme Court stop inviting amici curiae to defend abandoned lower court decisions?
INTRODUCTION I. BACKGROUND AND ORIGINS A. Pre-1954 B. The First Invitation: G... the defendant's claimed violations of his Miranda rights by holding that, under 18 U.S.C. [section] ...1151 (1997) (mem.); Arizonans for Official English v. Arizona, 517 U.S. 1102 (19...
- Stanford Law Review
- Vol. 63 Nbr. 4, April 2011
- Expanding law enforcement discretion: how the Supreme Court's post-September 11th decisions reflect necessary prudence.
... where the gun was located before issuing Miranda warnings. (58) The suspect replied, "The gun [was]... Ralph Arvizu in a remote area of southern Arizona and seized more than 100 pounds of marijuana follo..., with the notion of terrorism in the background, scrutinized cases involving ties to law enforceme...
- Suffolk University Law Review
- Vol. 41 Nbr. 3, June 2008
- State v. Grant, (Ohio 2011)
.... Procedural History and Factual Background {¶ 6} In September 2010, Grant was indict...�judgment from which Grant appeals. Miranda {¶ 14} In his first assignment of�...
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Eric Christopher Caldwell, Petitioner, vs. State of Florida, Respondent, (2010)
... as to whether an officer s reading of Miranda1 warnings during an. 1. Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U....[W]hatever the background of the person interrogated, a warning at the time ...
- Florida Supreme Court
- Judging facts like law.
... the circumstances were, [and] what the background conditions were." (12) Legislative facts, in contr... faced with the question of whether the Miranda rule could be supplanted by congressional statute.. (36) In Miranda v. Arizona the Court announced the warnings that are required...
- Constitutional Commentary
- Vol. 25 Nbr. 1, March 2008