military history

  • Receive alerts:
  • by e-mail
    Your information will be added to a database with the sole purpose of serving your subscription. This database is the exclusive property of vLex Networks S.L. and will never be shared with any other company. By sending your request you accept the Data Protection Policy of vLex Networks S.L.
  • via RSS
1 headnote for military history
More than 10.000 documents for military history
  • THE BEGINNINGS OF the School of Advanced Military Studies (SAMS) are more than 25 years old now. Some might find it incredible that it is so young, bu...

  • Terrorism is a form of military warfare that can only be eradicated by the armed forces. As a military tactic, terrorism aims to kill soldiers and lower the morale of citizens. To combat terrorism, the US armed forces should attack its military counterparts in countries sponsoring global terrorism. By focusing on military targets, civilian lives and properties are spared. The US armed forces can also conduct commando raids to seize and execute enemy leaders in foreign countries.

  • Military commissions have always been controversial in U.S. history, and no more so than in the past 10 years. Military commissions have traditionally...

  • When you think of the military and Kansas today, most thoughts probably go to Dwight D. Eisenhower, a Kansan who left Abilene to become the supreme Allied commander in World War II, overseeing the planning and execution of the Allied invasion of Europe, then becoming the 35th president of the United States. But you have to begin further back, to the early 19th century, to really understand how the military has helped shape our state history and how today's military continues to be part of the soul of Kansas.

  • THE MEXICAN-AMERICAN WAR loomed when Sarah Borginis followed her husband through the harsh frontier into what is now Texas. She enlisted as a cook, got issued a musket, fired it expertly and was made an honorary colonel by Gen. Zachary Taylor. As America's boundaries pushed westward, Eveline Alexander left New York and joined her cavalry-officer husband in 1866 as he battled American Indians in what is now Texas, New Mexico and Colorado. A few years later, Civil War bride Libbie Custer traveled 500 miles deep into the Dakota Territory alongside her husband, Lt. Col. George A. Custer. In a fort surrounded by wilderness, she made a home away from home.

  • The West Virginia Archives and History Library of the West Virginia Division of Culture and History will continue its series of after-hours lectures from 6 to 7:30 p.m. Tuesday, Nov. 9. In recognition of Veterans Day, the session, entitled "Researching Military History," will be conducted by Terry Lowry, staff historian for archives and history. The program will take place in the library at the Culture Center, State Capitol Complex in Charleston. All sessions are free to the public.

  • The variety of forms of being has always been and is the result of numerous ways of people's adaptation to the various circumstances in which they eme...

  • ORONO - John Lynn, a professor of military history at Northwestern University, will speak at 3:45 p.m. Monday, April 25, in the Bodwell Lounge at the Collins Center for the Arts at the University of Maine. Lynn's topic will be "The Reports of My Death Are Greatly Exaggerated: The Apparent Demise and Surprising Resurrection of Academic Military History.

  • History records Crispus Attacks as the first to die in the Revolutionary War but was he a conscripted soldier, was Attacks right in his fight? Was he really fighting for "his" freedom in that war? Peter Salem and Paul Whipple also fought during that war. However, Nat Turner was definitely not fighting as a conscripted soldier, but he was definitely fighting for "his" freedom. Shouldn't Turner be heralded the same way that Attacks is? History shows that Turner was "really" fighting for "his own" freedom? The difference between those two men was the mindset; and that is, who and what did they believe they were fighting for? The answer can be ascertained through the chronicles of the life of the Black soldier. He has fought in every American War, often for someone else's freedom only to be...

  • During the global conflicts of the first half of the 20th century, U.S. servicemen fought in Europe for the first time in the nation's history. African-Americans were among the troops committed to combat in World War I and World War II, even though they and other Black Americans were denied the full blessings of the freedom for which the United States had pledged to fight. Traditional racist views about the use of Black troops in combat initially excluded African-Americans from the early recruiting efforts and much of the actual combat in both wars. Nonetheless, large numbers of African-Americans still volunteered to fight for their country in 1917-18 and 1940-45. Once again, many Black servicemen hoped their military contribution and sacrifice would prove to their white countrymen that...



Loading

ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.

Contents in vLex United States

Explore vLex

For Professionals

For Partners

Company