magnuson-moss warranty act summary

Receive alerts:
by e-mail
E-mail Your information will be added to a database with the sole purpose of serving your subscription. This database is the exclusive property of vLex Networks S.L. and will never be shared with any other company. By sending your request you accept the Data Protection Policy of vLex Networks S.L. I have read and accept the Terms of Use
via RSS

156 documents for magnuson-moss warranty act summary

- Hedrick v. Spitzer Motor City, Inc., (Ohio 2007)
Ohio Consumer Sales Practices Act, fraud, Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, motion for summary judgment, de novo, Civ.R. 56, res judicata, final judgment, release agreement, general contract provision, specific contract provision, attorney fees.
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Roman v. Volkswagen of Am., Inc., (Ohio 2008)
summary judgment, contract interpretation, auto lease, warranty, Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Urso v. Compact Cars, Inc., (Ohio 2007)
CONTRACTS - breach of implied warranty of merchantability; jury instructions; Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act; directed verdict; plaintiff's opinion testimony; summary judgment; moot or harmless with judgment in favor of nonmoving party.
- Ohio Supreme Court

- The legal infrastructure of ex post consumer debtor protections.
... lawyers' use of the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, which had been widely touted in the national ... to motions to dismiss, motions for summary judgment and other pleadings including counterclai...
- Fordham Urban Law Journal
- Vol. 38 Nbr. 3, March 2011
- Carpet One Mentor, Inc. v. Bridge, (Ohio 2007)
CONTRACTS - summary judgment; breach of warranty; consumer sales practices act; magnuson-moss warranty act; disclaimer; directed verdict; JNOV; anticipatory repudiation; home solicitation sales act; jury instructions; no objection; no plain error.
- Ohio Supreme Court
- 16 CFR 703.6 - Recordkeeping.
... INTERPRETATIONS UNDER THE MAGNUSON-MOSS WARRANTY ACT. PART 703: INFORMAL DISPUTE SETTLEMENT PROCEDU...(7) A summary of any relevant and material information presented...
- Code of Federal Regulations - Title 16: Commercial Practices
- Iams v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., (Ohio 2007)
Trial court did not err in granting summary judgment in favor of Chrysler on plaintiff's Lemon law & Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (MMWA) claims. "Nonconformity" under Ohio Lemon law is an objective standard, measured in terms of a reasonable person. Liability under the MMWA is generally only found where the product has numerous, serious defects, not trivial defects that can be easily corrected.
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Cox v. Kia Motors Am., Inc., (Ohio 2011)
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS EVID/WIT/TRIAL: The trial court did not err in denying a defendants motion for summary judgment on a claim for breach of an express limited warranty under the federal Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, when the Act applied to both full and limited warranties. The trial court did not err in allowing opinion testimony regarding the value of an automobile from lay witnesses, when those witnesses owned the vehicle and were intimately familiar with its repair history and operation.
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Jeff Anderson v. Gulf Stream Coach,, (7th Cir. 2011)
...The district court entered summary judgment in favor of Gulf Stream on all of the And... Indiana law claims for breach of express warranty and breach of implied warranty, and their federal ...
- Federal Circuits
- Whitt v. Mazda Motor of Am., Inc., (Ohio 2011)
Lemon Law not applicable to design defect as such not covered under expressed warranty.

... Pleas, which granted summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee Mazda Motor of�...
- Ohio Supreme Court