Macpherson v Buick Motor Co

Receive alerts:
by e-mail
E-mail Your information will be added to a database with the sole purpose of serving your subscription. This database is the exclusive property of vLex Networks S.L. and will never be shared with any other company. By sending your request you accept the Data Protection Policy of vLex Networks S.L. I have read and accept the Terms of Use
via RSS

170 documents for Macpherson v Buick Motor Co

- Macpherson v. Buick Motor Co.
A famous 1916 New York Court of Appeals decision, MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co., 217 N.Y. 382, 111 N.E. 1050, expanded the cl...
- West's Encyclopedia of American Law
- Jap–Ma
- Betty Jane Luzadder, Executrix of the Estate of David P. Luzadder, Deceased, v. Despatch Oven Company and Eclipse Inc. v. Brockway, Inc., a Corporation; Honeywell, Inc. Appeal of Betty Jane Luzadder., 834 F.2d 355 (3rd Cir. 1987)
... Court discussed the seminal case of MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co., 217 N.Y. 382, 111 N.E. 1050 (1...
- Federal Circuits
- The moral of MacPherson.
Interpretations of the New York Appeals Court 1905 decision in Macpherson v. Buick Motor Co. provides a foundation for an argument in favor of a non-instrumental approach to tort law, instead of a utilitarian, rules-based approach. MacPherson embraced duty of care as it applied to a manufacturer. Duty of care is a moral concept that is exhibited throughout tort law. Such concepts emphasize legal rights are based on moral obligations and not on the threat of legal punishment.
- University of Pennsylvania Law Review
- Vol. 146 Nbr. 6, August 1998

- Tort, not contract: an argument for reevaluating the economic loss rule and classifying building damage as "other property" when it is caused by defective construction materials.
...THE ECONOMIC LOSS RULE A. MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co B. Seely v. White Motor Co C. Ea...
- William and Mary Law Review
- Vol. 53 Nbr. 1, October 2011
- The controversial contradiction between traditional precedent and recent failure to warn jurisprudence in New York.
... to Judge Cardozo's 1916 decision in MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co. (3) In MacPherson, a case invol...
- Albany Law Review
- Vol. 74 Nbr. 2, January 2011
- Young v. Masci, 289 U.S. 253 (1933)
...1092; and for negligent manufacture, MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co., 217 N.Y. 382, 111 N.E. 1050, L...
- U.S. Supreme Court
- East River S. S. Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc., 476 U.S. 858 (1986)
...See Seely v. White Motor Co., 63 Cal. 2d 9, 15, 403 P.2d 145, 149 (1965). I...See, e. g., MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co., 217 N. Y. 382, 389, 111 N. E. ...
- U.S. Supreme Court
- American Car & Foundry Co. v. Brassert, 289 U.S. 261 (1933)
...109 et seq.; MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co., 217 N.Y. 382, 111 N.E. 1050, L...
- U.S. Supreme Court
- What climate change can do about tort law.
... fossil fuel companies, electric utilities, motor vehicle manufacturers, and other entities that pla... with Cardozo's storied opinion in MacPherson v. Buick Motor Company, (239) and continuing until...
- Environmental Law
- Vol. 41 Nbr. 1, January 2011
- Dalehite v. United States, 346 U.S. 15 (1953)
..., not merely possible, but probable," MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co., 217 N. Y. 382, 389, 111 N. E. ...
- U.S. Supreme Court