limited jurisdiction trial court

• Sneed v. Sneed, (Ohio 2005)

Finding that the trial court properly found that Appellee established limited personal jurisdiction over nonresident Appellant pursuant to R.C. 3115.03, but that it went beyond the limited jurisdiction granted in that statute, the judgment is affirmed in part.

• Ohio Supreme Court

• High Court Snuffs S.C. Bid: ; Ruling Says Injunction Allowing Players to Participate Not in Courts Authority

After a weeks-long legal battle, Brooke and Martinsburg high schools will head to the rescheduled Class AAA state championship football game this weekend. The championship game will be 7 p.m. Saturday in Wheeling. The state Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld the West Virginia Secondary School Activities Commissions suspension of four South Charleston High football players. The SSAC suspended nine players after an end-of-game brawl at the Nov. 19 Hurricane/South Charleston quarterfinal game: four from Hurricane and five from South Charleston. But four South Charleston players Tyler Harris, Pierria Henry, Trevond Reese and Emerson Gagnon contended game officials did not follow proper protocol when expelling them from the game and took the issue to court. Kanawha Circuit Judge Carrie Webste...

• Charleston Daily Mail
• December 08, 2010

• Courts; Retention; Jurisdiction; Judicial District Changes; Terms

(A) Court Retention; Trial Courts of Limited Jurisdiction. The district, fami...

• Louisiana Constitution

• McDaniel v. Phelps, (Ohio 2003)

Jurisdiction/Venue - Civil Miscellaneous; The trial court did not err in dismissing claims against a church for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction: the claims that pastors had improperly assumed their positions, that they had committed financial misconduct, and that they had wrongfully dismissed the plaintiffs from church membership involved ecclesiastical matters that were beyond the jurisdiction of the court; and the failure to make the church’s articles of incorporation and governing guide a part of the record was fatal to the claim that the plaintiffs had standing to sue and that there were secular principles upon which the trial court could have adjudicated their dispute. Although it considered matters outside the complaint, the trial court did not err in refusing to convert a mo...

...12(B)(1), the trial court is not limited to the allegations in the complaint and may consid...

• Ohio Supreme Court

• Product Manufacturers Face Uncertain Future as U.S. Supreme Court Considers New Contours for States' Exercise of Personal Jurisdiction.

..., a state court's jurisdictional power was limited to its physical boundaries.5 But as the nation gre...The trial court agreed with McIntyre, but the Appellate Divi...

• Mondaq Business Briefing
• Nbr. 2011, January 2011

• Seitz v. Seitz, (Ohio 2011)

In divorce decree, trial court abused its discretion in failing to retain jurisdiction over an indefinite award of spousal support. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting wife’s post-divorce motion for relief from judgment, so as to retain jurisdiction over a spousal support arrearage. Judgment and decree of divorce reversed and remanded for the limited purpose of entering an amended order that retains jurisdiction over spousal support. Judgment granting Civ.R. 60(B) relief affirmed.

• Ohio Supreme Court

• MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc., 549 U.S (2007)

... claims for lack of subject- matter jurisdiction because, under Federal Circuit precedent, a patent...That petitioner limited its contract argument to a few pages of its appell... court and reiterated that "[i]n the trial court, of course, a party seeking a declaratory ju...

• U.S. Supreme Court

• Community State Bank v. James Strong, (11th Cir. 2011)

... IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS. FOR THE EL... to navigate the labyrinth of federal jurisdiction to determine whether the district court had jurisd... Cash America to produce discovery on the limited issue of the enforceability of the arbitration agr... court shall proceed summarily to the trial thereof. . 9U.S.C. § 4. . Section 2 of th...

• Federal Circuits

• Merchants Acceptance, Inc. v. Bucholz, (Ohio 2011)

The trial court lacked jurisdiction, under the garnishment statute, to vacate the default judgment against Appellee at a garnishment hearing limited to consideration of the amount of her personal earnings, if any, that could be used to satisfy the debt. The order from which this appeal is taken is reversed and remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

• Ohio Supreme Court

• Stern v. Marshall, 564 U.S. (2011)

... On September 27, 2000, after abench trial, the Bankruptcy Court issued a judgmenton V... that the Bankruptcy Court lacked jurisdiction over Vickie's counter­claim. In particular, Pi...'s authority over the counterclaim was limited because Vickie's counterclaim was not a "core proc...

• U.S. Supreme Court