limitation act

• 'Limitation Of Actions - Date On Which Cause Of Action 'Discoverable By Plaintiff' - s 50D Limitation Act'.

Baker-Morrison v State Of New South Wales [2009] NSWCA 35 In Brief In the first Court of Appeal decision regarding the construction of ss 50C and 50...

• Mondaq Business Briefing
• Nbr. 2009, January 2009

• Medicaid Program; Disproportionate Share Hospital Payments-Uninsured Definition

This proposed rule addresses the hospital-specific limitation on Medicaid disproportionate share hospital (DSH) payments under the Social Security Act. Under this limitation, DSH payments to a hospital cannot exceed the uncompensated costs of furnishing hospital services by the hospital to individuals who are Medicaid-eligible or ``have no health insurance (or other source of third party coverage) for the services furnished during the year.'' This rule would provide that the quoted phrase would refer in context to a lack of coverage on a service-specific basis, so that the calculation of uncompensated care for purposes of the hospital-specific DSH limit would include the cost of each service furnished to an individual who had no health insurance or other source of third party coverage f...

• Federal Register Nbr. 77 FR 2500, January 18, 2012
• Proposed rules
• Health and Human Services Department

• Interpretation Of ss 50C And 50D Of The Limitation Act 1969 - Date When A Cause Of Action Is 'Discoverable'.

Bostik Australia Pty Ltd v Liddiard and Anor [2009] NSWCA 167 In Brief It is not sufficient for the purposes of the Limitation Act 1969, s 50D(1)(...

• Mondaq Business Briefing
• Nbr. 2009, January 2009

• Gati v. Americredit Fin., (Ohio 2012)

Replevin; repossession; R.C. 4505.13/security interest in a motor vehicle/rights of secured party; temporary restraining order; injunctive relief; Consumer Sales Practices Act; statute of limitation

• Ohio Supreme Court

• Sections 50C And 50D Limitation Act 1969 - When Is A Cause Of Action Discoverable.

Judgment date: 3 August 20091 Frizelle v Bauer [2009] NSWCA 239 In Brief For the purposes of s 50C of the Limitation Act 1969 proceedings in respect...

• Mondaq Business Briefing
• Nbr. 2009, January 2009

• 41 USC 10 - Sec. 10b-2. Limitation on authority to waive Buy American Act requirement

• US Code - Title 41: Public Contracts

• The House of Lords provides further clarity on the Limitation Act 1980.

By Eve O'Brien and Andrew Symons There are a number of recent high profile cases which seek to provide clarity to the provisions of the Limitation A...

• Mondaq Business Briefing
• Nbr. 2006, January 2006

• The Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA): Understanding the Failures of State Opt-In Mechanisms

In 1996, President Clinton signed the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act ("AEDPA"). This Act provides, among other things, for a reduced limitation period for the filing of habeas corpus claims by petitioners under a state capital sentence. In order for a state to avail itself of this benefit, the Act requires that the state establish a mechanism for appointing counsel in collateral proceedings for indigent prisoners under a capital sentence. The AEDPA also requires that the state establish this mechanism according to strict standards and procedures. As of May 15, 2007, no state has satisfied the requirements of the Act. This Note examines the requirements of the AEDPA and identifies why courts across the nation have held that every state attempt has failed to satisfy these r...

• Iowa Law Review
• Nbr. 92-5, July 2007

• 40 CFR 223.4 - Request for, scheduling and conduct of public hearing; determination.

... OF PERMITS; REVISION, REVOCATION OR LIMITATION OF OCEAN DUMPING PERMITS UNDER SECTION 104(d) OF T...

• Code of Federal Regulations - Title 40: Protection of Environment

• Calculation of Maximum Obligation Limitation

This notice of proposed rulemaking is published jointly by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the ``FDIC'') and the Departmental Offices of the Department of the Treasury (the ``Treasury'') (collectively, the ``Agencies'') and proposes rules to implement applicable provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (``Dodd-Frank Act'').\1\ In accordance with the requirements of the Dodd-Frank Act, the proposed rules govern the calculation of the maximum obligation limitation (``MOL''), as specified in section 210(n)(6) of the Dodd-Frank Act. The MOL limits the aggregate amount of outstanding obligations that the FDIC may issue or incur in connection with the orderly liquidation of a covered financial company. ---------------------------------------------...

• Federal Register Nbr. 76 FR 72645, November 25, 2011
• Proposed rules
• Treasury Department