libelous per quod

5 similar searches for libelous per quod

Receive alerts:
by e-mail
E-mail Your information will be added to a database with the sole purpose of serving your subscription. This database is the exclusive property of vLex Networks S.L. and will never be shared with any other company. By sending your request you accept the Data Protection Policy of vLex Networks S.L. I have read and accept the Terms of Use
via RSS

76 documents for libelous per quod

- Computerized Thermal Imaging, Inc., a Nevada Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bloomberg, L.P., a Delaware Limited Partnership, Defendant-Appellee., 312 F.3d 1292 (10th Cir. 2002)
... state a claim for libel per se or libel per quod, the latter defeated by the absence of a proper pl... Articles,2 which, it concluded, were not libelous per se under Baum v. Gillman, 667 P.2d 41, 43 (Uta...
- Federal Circuits
- Yoakam v. Boyd, (Ohio 2010)
Libel per se; qualified privilege; actual malice.

...* * *." . 5. . - 5 -. offense was not libelous per se because the portion of the letter was a que... in the letter were not libelous per quod and found that because Yoakam had neither pled nor...
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Continental Nut Company, a Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert L. Berner Company, a Corporation, Robert L. Berner, J. P. Farrell, Smith & Swinton Company, a Corporation, Jay Brokerage, a Corporation, Herbertjubelier, William J. Smith, and Arthur J. Swinton, Defendants-Appellees., 345 F.2d 395 (7th Cir. 1965)
...The conduct alleged to be libelous was the publication and distribution of a letter t... in question was libelous both per se and per quod. The district court dismissed the complaint as to ...
- Federal Circuits

- William R. Wallingford, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Zenith Radio Corporation, Defendant-Appellee., 310 F.2d 693 (7th Cir. 1962)
... plaintiff's claim is founded were not libelous per se. Plaintiff alleged that defendant, Zenith R... founded, are not claimed to be libelous per quod, and moved to amend his complaint to allege said c...
- Federal Circuits
- Electric Furnace Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee and Plaintiff, Cross-Appellant, v. Deering Milliken Research Corporation, Defendant-Appellant and Defendant,Cross-Appellee., 383 F.2d 352 (6th Cir. 1967)
... of Electric Furnace's customers was not libelous per se, but could be found to be libelous per quod...
- Federal Circuits
- Sunward Corporation, Wedg-Cor, Inc., and Marvel Brute Steel Buildings, Inc., Plaintiffs/Appellees/Cross-Appellants, v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc., Defendant/Appellant/Cross-Appellee., 811 F.2d 511 (10th Cir. 1987)
...& Bradstreet reports in question were not libelous per se under Colorado law, and that Dun & Bradstre... from extrinsic circumstances (libel per quod). 3 . Quoting controlling Colorado precedent, the ...
- Federal Circuits
- King v. Semi Valley Sound, L.L.C., (Ohio 2011)
Under Rule 12(B)(6) of the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure, pro se defendant properly pleaded a claim for false light invasion of privacy, but not for defamation, where a publication falsely identified him, a formerly registered sex offender, as currently subject to registration requirements.

... defamatory on its face; defamation per quod occurs when material is defamatory through interp...Written matter is libelous per se if, on its face, it reflects upon a person...
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Fleck Bros. Co., a New Jersey Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rose M. Sullivan and William W. Nagel, Co-Partners, D/B/a Manufacturers Clearing House of Illinois, and Manufacturers Clearing House of Illinois, Inc., an Illinois Corporation, Defendants-Appellants., 423 F.2d 155 (7th Cir. 1970)
... was previously held by this court to be libelous per quod, under Illinois law. 385 F.2d 223 (1967)....
- Federal Circuits
- Kleier Advertising, Inc., & Kleier Marketing, Inc., Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. Premier Pontiac, Inc.; Bill Stokely, Dba Stokely Outdoor Advertising and Sign Company; and Stokely Outdoor Advertising Inc., Defendants/Appellees., 921 F.2d 1036 (10th Cir. 1990)
... the statements are not defamatory or libelous per se, but do not agree that the statements were ... meaning (commonly referred to as libel per quod); and. (3) Those clearly defamatory on their face ...
- Federal Circuits
- Budd Lepman, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Marjorie Everett and Time, Incorporated, a Corporation, Defendants-Appellees., 333 F.2d 154 (7th Cir. 1964)
... that the language complained of is not libelous per se, is not libelous per quod, is not of and co...
- Federal Circuits