-
Zohar Zik1 considers the decision of Pindell Limited v AirAsia Berhad2, in which the court rejected a claim made by an aircraft lessor against the les...
-
This Article examines current judicial interpretation of Section 7 of the Clayton Act through the lens of negotiation theory. The research exposes a gap between how courts state they are analyzing efficiency claims in Section 7 Clayton Act enforcement actions and what they are actually doing. During periods of lax antitrust enforcement, this pattern is not readily visible, since almost all proposed merger and acquisition ("M&A") deals are approved. With a shift to more aggressive antitrust policy, however, it is critical that merger review include appropriate weighing of transaction-generated efficiencies-something missing from courts' current antitrust analysis. Although only a small number of Section 7 cases are litigated each year, corporate negotiators assess thousands of potent...
-
Introduction II. Comparison Among Civil Law Systems III. Comparison Among Common Law And Civil Law Systems A. Starting Points 1. Civil Law 2. Common Law B. A Possible Ending Point IV. Comparing American And Foreign Law
-
- Notice: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(B)(2) States Unpublished Orders Shall Not Be Cited or Used as Precedent Except To Support a Claim of Res Judicata, Collateral Estoppel or Law of the Case in Any Federal Court Within the Circuit. Taurus Holding Company of America, Incorporated, and Leoco, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Reginald Thompson, Julia Thompson, T.L.C. Gem Labs, Incorporated, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees,, 129 F.3d 1268 (7th Cir. 1997)
Before Hon. Joel M. Flaum, Circuit Judge Hon. Kenneth F. Ripple, Circuit Judge Hon. Terence T. Evans, Circuit Judge
ORDER
The Taurus Holding Company ...
-
In June 2003, citing "two senior administration officials," syndicated columnist Robert Novak openly identified Valerie Plame as a Central Intelligenc...
-
In the Cohen case described herein, the state claims court denied the defendant's motion for summary judgment because there was some question surrounding whether the whirlpool at issue posed an open and obvious risk of drowning to state park visitors. The common-law emergency doctrine which recognizes that when an actor is faced with a sudden and unexpected circumstance which leaves little or no time for thought, deliberation, or consideration, or causes the actor to be reasonably so disturbed that the actor must make a speedy decision without weighing alternative courses of conduct, the actor may not be negligent if the actions taken are reasonable and prudent in the emergency context, provided the actor has not created the emergency.
-
I. THE CLASS ACTION FAIRNESS ACT ("CAFA")
In 2005, CAFA was enacted to assure fair and prompt recoveries for class members with legitimate claims, r...
-
The liberalization of India's economy since 1991 has brought with it considerable development of its financial markets and supporting legal institutions. An influential body of economic scholarship asserts that a country's "legal origin" - as a civilian or common law jurisdiction - plays an important part in determining the development of its investor protection regulations, and consequently its financial development. An alternative theory claims that the determinants of investor protection are political, rather than legal. We use the case of India to test these theories. We find little support for the idea that India's legal heritage as a common law country has been influential in speeding the path of regulatory reforms and financial development. Rather, we suggest there are complement...
-
An appellate court generally resolves all of the issues presented to it with finality. After resolution in the appellate court, however, it is not unc...
-
THE COURT USHER'S VOICE rang out in the courtroom at the Old Bailey: "Call Kingsley Amis!" Amis, the well-known British comic novelist, was nowhere to...