ineffective assistance of counsel california

• State v. Brown, (Ohio 2010)

Revocation of probation; Anders v. California (1967), 386 U.S. 738; abuse of discretion; ineffective assistance of counsel; no non-frivolous issues for review; affirmed.

• Ohio Supreme Court

• State v. Carter, (Ohio 2006)

Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738, ineffective assistance of counsel; State v. Foster, 109 Ohio St.3d 1, 2006-Ohio-856.

• Ohio Supreme Court

• Cullen v. Pinholster, 563 U.S. (2011)

...After the California Supreme Court twice unanimouslydenied Pinholster h... Courtconcluded that Pinholster's trial counsel had been constitutionally ineffective at the penal... of the Court inter alia, ineffective assistance of counsel at the penaltyphase of his trial. He a...

• U.S. Supreme Court

• State v. McFarland, (Ohio 2010)

Trial court properly concluded that defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his Miranda rights and that his statements to a police detective were voluntarily made. Appellate court will disregard assignment of error claiming ineffective assistance of counsel, which included a disclaimer by appellate counsel under Anders v. California (1967), 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, that the assignment of error was wholly frivolous. Judgment affirmed.

• Ohio Supreme Court

• State v. Keough, (Ohio 2009)

Anders v. California (1967), 386 U.S. 738, applied and followed; manifest weight; ineffective assistance of counsel; sentencing

• Ohio Supreme Court

• State v. Porter, (Ohio 2008)

APPELLATE PROCEDURE – Anders v. California (1967), 386 U.S. 738; motion to withdraw; wholly frivolous; ineffective assistance of counsel; guilty plea; plain error.

• Ohio Supreme Court

• JESSE GONZALEZ V. ROBERT WONG, (9th Cir. 2011)

...California State Prison at San. ... COUNSEL Robert Berke, Santa Monica, California; Mark E. Ov... denied the Brady claim (and related ineffective assistance of counsel claim, see note 2) and reman...

• Federal Circuits

• State v. Jackson, (Ohio 2007)

Trial court did not err by accepting appellant's no contest plea and appellant did not receive ineffective assistance of counsel. Appellate counsel's request to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California is granted.

• Ohio Supreme Court

• State v. Connors-Camp, (Ohio 2006)

Although evidence in record on suppression issues is conflicting, trial court could reasonably find, as it did, that defendant’s mother consented to search of basement of her home, where defendant had been sleeping, and that defendant had no proprietary interest in this area that precluded his mother from giving effective consent. Evidence, although conflicting, also supports trial court’s finding that proper Miranda warnings were given, and that defendant knowingly and voluntarily consented to give a statement to investigating police officers. Therefore, trial court did not err in denying motion to suppress. Defendant’s conviction for Aggravated Murder and Aggravated Robbery is not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Issue of ineffective assistance of trial counsel, offered ...

.... California (1967), 386 U.S. 738, with regard to the issue of ...

• Ohio Supreme Court

• Knowles v. Mirzayance, 556 U. S. ____ (2009)

... scheduled, Mirzayance accepted his counsel’s recommendation to abandon the insanity plea. Couns... to withdraw the NGI plea constituted ineffective assistance of counsel under Strickland v. Washingt... The trial court denied relief, and the California Court of Appeal affirmed. Mirzayance then ap...

• U.S. Supreme Court