Inadvertence

• 19 CFR 173.4 - Correction of clerical error, mistake of fact, or inadvertence.

• Code of Federal Regulations - Title 19: Customs Duties

• Inadvertence

The absence of attention or care; the failure of an individual to carefully and prudently observe the progress ...

• West's Encyclopedia of American Law
• Fri–Jam

• Dye v. Smith, (Ohio 2010)

Civ.R. 54(C); Civ.R. 60(B); default judgment; excusable neglect; inadvertence; kind and maximum amount of damages;

• Ohio Supreme Court

• What Sheriffs Need to Know to Protect Against Inadequate Training Litigation: Part I

According to the U.S. Supreme Court, "Prison and jail officials have qualified immunity as a defense against personal liability when they act with good faith." According to the Supreme Court, It is obduracy and wantonness, not inadvertence or error in good faith that creates the constitutional violation.

• Sheriff
• Vol. 61 Nbr. 2, March 2009

• Akron Gen. Med. Ctr. v. Med. Mut. of Ohio, (Ohio 2009)

Civ.R. 60(B) – default judgment – abuse of discretion – mistake – inadvertence – neglect – hearing – meritorious defense – operative facts

• Ohio Supreme Court

• Weight Losses

Most-claims underwriting occurs when an insurer waits until a claim has been filed to obtain information and make underwriting decisions which should have been made when the application for insurance was first made. Some statutes expressly prohibit insurers from rescinding a policy based on post-claims underwriting. In Hailey v. California Physicians' Service, the court construed California's Health and Safety Code section 1389.3, the post-claims underwriting statute governing health care service plans. The Court of Appeal explained that a provider cannot "complete medical underwriting" within the meaning of section 1389.3 by blindly accepting the responses on a subscriber's application without performing any inquiry into whether the responses were the result of mistake or inadvertence....

• Best's Review
• Vol. 110 Nbr. 3, July 2009

• Youngblood v. Kindred Healthcare, (Ohio 2010)

Civ.R. 41(B)(1); notice; with prejudice; abuse of discretion; Civ.R. 60(B)(1); inadvertence; excusable neglect; workers’ compensation

• Ohio Supreme Court

• Courtroom comedy: these examples are taken from actual official courtroom records across the nation. Because recorders operate at all times in courts of law, even the slightest inadvertence ends up preserved for posterity.

Lawyer: Was that the same nose you broke as a child? Witness: I only have one, you know. Lawyer: Now, Mrs. Johnson, how was your first marriage te...

• Saturday Evening Post
• Vol. 274 Nbr. 1, January 2002

• Qualchoice, Inc. v. Brennan, (Ohio 2009)

CIVIL - subrogation; relief from judgment; Civ.R. 60(B); inadvertence and excusable neglect; default judgment; Civ.R. 55(A); hearing on damages; liquidated and unliquidated damages

• Ohio Supreme Court

• What's Wrong with Involuntary Manslaughter?

Efforts to explain when and why the state can legitimately impose retributive punishment on an actor who inadvertently creates an unjustified risk of causing death (and death results) typically rely on one of two theories. The prior-choice theory claims that retributive punishment for inadvertent lethal risk creation is justified if and only if the actor's inadvertence or ignorance was a but-for and proximate result of a prior culpable choice. The hypothetical-choice theory claims that retributive punishment for inadvertent lethal risk creation is justified if and only if the actor would have chosen to take the risk if he had been aware of it, even though he was not in fact aware of it. I argue that neither of these theories satisfactorily identifies when and why retributive punishment ...

• Texas Law Review
• Vol. 85 Nbr. 2, December 2006