Imputed Knowledge

Receive alerts:
by e-mail
E-mail Your information will be added to a database with the sole purpose of serving your subscription. This database is the exclusive property of vLex Networks S.L. and will never be shared with any other company. By sending your request you accept the Data Protection Policy of vLex Networks S.L. I have read and accept the Terms of Use
via RSS

6.913 documents for Imputed Knowledge

- 16 CFR 1115.11 - Imputed knowledge.
- Code of Federal Regulations - Title 16: Commercial Practices
- Imputed Knowledge
The comprehension attributed or charged to a person because the facts in issue were open to discovery and it was that person's du...
- West's Encyclopedia of American Law
- Fri–Jam
- Butler v. Wyndtree Housing Ltd. Partnership, (Ohio 2012)
Summary judgment, receiver, landlord, lessor, tenant, lease, contract, ordinary meaning, negligence, negligence per se, proximate cause, statutory duties, ordinary care, smoke alarms, notice, actual notice, constructive notice, defect, violation, liability, imputed knowledge, agency, agent, foreseeability, injury, common law.
- Ohio Supreme Court

- Orrenmaa v. CTI Audio, Inc., (Ohio 2008)
PUBLIC NUISANCE - demolition costs; notice; imputed knowledge; constructive notice; damages.
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Knowledge of Wrongful Acts Imputed to Law Firm Despite Severability Clause
The severability clause of an insurance policy did not prevent imputation of knowledge to a law firm of the wrongful acts committed by its attorneys. In reviewing the decision of U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge Shira A. Scheindlin in Steadfast Insurance Co. v. Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the judgment of the district court.
- Daily Record (Rochester, NY)
- August 19, 2004
- Zuzan v. Shutrump, (Ohio 2003)
Open and obvious doctrine; Imputed knowledge from prior usage; Summary judgment; Attendant circumstance; Carry heavy materials is not an attendant circumstance.
- Ohio Supreme Court
- 1st Circuit Rules Employer Can't Be Held Liable for Sexual Harassment
A co-worker's knowledge of an employee's statements about alleged sexual harassment cannot be imputed to the employer under Title VII, the 1st Circuit has ruled. The plaintiff was a female factory worker and entry-level supervisor. Soon after her employer notified everyone it might go bankrupt in the near future she gave her two- weeks notice in writing. In her written resignation she stated that supervisors had discussed her personal affairs and that she no longer felt comfortable working there. This was her first complaint about the issue.
- Lawyers USA
- September 22, 2008
- SunTrust Bank, N.A. v. John Northen, (4th Cir. 2012)
... was deficient, the Trustee was imputed with constructive knowl edge of the lien on Tract... because either (1) he had constructive knowledge of the deed of trust that was properly recorded as...
- Federal Circuits
- September Winds Motor Coach, Inc. v. Medical Mut. of Ohio, (Ohio 2004)
Insurance agent for insurer had knowledge of insured's medical conditions which was imputed to the insurer. Genuine issue of material fact existed regarding whether insureds knew that correct information was not included in insurance application. Because of agent's knowledge, cases relied upon by trial court were distinguishable on their facts.
- Ohio Supreme Court
- SunTrust Bank, N.A. v. John Northen, (4th Cir. 2012)
... was deficient, the Trustee was imputed with constructive knowl edge of the lien on Tract... because either (1) he had constructive knowledge of the deed of trust that was properly recorded as...
- Federal Circuits