-
U.S. Supreme Court HEALY v. JAMES, 408 U.S. 169 (1972) 408 U.S. 169
HEALY ET AL. v. JAMES ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS...
-
NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
...
-
Prior to June 2010, the circuits were split as to whether universities may refuse to fund student groups that discriminate against certain classes of individuals in violation of the universities’ nondiscrimination policies. In June 2010, the Supreme Court purported to resolve this circuit split in Christian Legal Society v. Martinez, holding that a university policy requiring student groups to admit all students (an "all-comers policy") to receive university funding is constitutional. The Court, however, declined to resolve the larger issue-whether it is constitutional for a university to refuse to fund a student group that discriminates against a specific class of individuals who are protected by the university’s written nondiscrimination policy. This Note argues that the Supreme Court...
-
Abraham S. Silver, of Pudlin & Silver, New Britain, Conn. (Alvin Pudlin, on the brief), for plaintiffs-appellants.
F. Michael Ahern, Asst. Atty. Gen...
-
... Tinker was reaffirmed by the Court in Healy v. James , in which it held that the withholding ...
-
...See Healy v. James, 408 U. S. 169; Widmar v. Vincent, 454 U....
-
...Later cases from the 1970s--such as Healy v. James, involving the registration of student or...
-
...Martinez, 130 S. Ct. 2971 (2010); contra Healy v. James, 408 U,S. 169 (1972). . (24.) Bd. of Educ...
-
...In particular, Healy v. James, (1972), concerns a group's claim of acc...
-
Mr. Daniel J. Andersen, Washington, D.C., for appellant.
Mr. Arthur J. Hilland, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Ferdinand J. Mack, [100 U.S.App.D.C....