harmless error rule

Receive alerts:
by e-mail
E-mail Your information will be added to a database with the sole purpose of serving your subscription. This database is the exclusive property of vLex Networks S.L. and will never be shared with any other company. By sending your request you accept the Data Protection Policy of vLex Networks S.L. I have read and accept the Terms of Use
via RSS

More than 10.000 documents for harmless error rule

- 48 CFR 6101.29 - Clerical mistakes; harmless error [Rule 29].
- Code of Federal Regulations - Title 48: Federal Acquisition Regulations System
- 38 CFR 20.1102 - Rule 1102. Harmless error.
- Code of Federal Regulations - Title 38: Pensions, Bonuses, and Veterans' Relief
- 18 USC 3741 - Sec. 3741. Harmless error and plain error - (Rule)
- U.S. Code - Title 18: Crimes and Criminal Procedure

- Slokar v. Parma, (Ohio 2009)
Summary judgment, firefighter, substance abuse, disability, drug and alcohol testing policy, discharged, Ohio Civil Rights Act, R.C. 4112, safe harbor provisions, intensive outpatient treatment, motion to strike exhibits, untimely filed, abuse of discretion, Civ.R. 56(C), Civ.R. 61, harmless error rule, defect, cured.
- Ohio Supreme Court
- The Louisiana 'Explanatory Exception': Faithfulness to Louisiana?s Hearsay Framework or Mere Storytime with the Prosecution?
Introduction - II. Anatomy of an Anecdote: What Is the Explanatory - Exception? - A. The Rule: Hearsay - B. The "Exception": Explanation - C. What It Was and What It Is - D. Scope of the Exception - . Relevancy - . Verbal Statements v. Conduct - . Constitutional Restrictions - . Other Evidentiary Limitations - III. Louisiana’s Application of the Explanatory Exception: - A Tumultuous Tale - A. The Supreme Court Trilogy - B. Too Much Hearsay Relevancy - C. Uncaging of the Beast: Inconsistent Appellate - Application - . Blatant Explanatory Exception Abuse - . Specific Categories of Misuse - IV. Resolving the Plot’s Central Conflict: How to Legally - Apply the Explanatory Exception in Louisiana - A. Return to a Proper Relevancy Analysis - . Explanations of an Officer’s Conduct - . Explan...
- Louisiana Law Review
- Nbr. 71-4, July 2011
- State v. Morris, (Ohio 2010)
Trial courts admission of improper other-acts evidence under Evidence Rule 404(B) was not harmless error because, in the absence of the improper evidence, there was not overwhelming proof of guilt and the inflammatory material was not limited to a brief, isolated comment.
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Although a trial court's failure to rule on a motion in limine may constitute an abuse of discretion, a harmless error will not overturn a ruling.
People v Holloway, No. 1-05-3439; 2009 WL 2259100 (1st D 2009) On July 24, 2009, the Illinois Appellate Court, First District, affirmed the judgment...
- Illinois Bar Journal
- Vol. 97 Nbr. 10, October 2009
- State v. Holloway, (Ohio 2011)
Allowing the victim to read her written statement during her direct testimony was improper because no rule of evidence warranted such reading; the error was not harmless because it deprived the defendant of a fair trial where the content of the written statement was vital to the prosecutions case to prove the elements of kidnapping.
- Ohio Supreme Court
- United States v. Lane, 474 U.S. 438 (1986)
... were misjoined in violation of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 8(b), which provides that tw... Misjoinder under Rule 8(b) is subject to harmless-error analysis and is not reversible error per se....
- U.S. Supreme Court
- U.S. v. Blechman, (10th Cir. 2011)
... business records exception to the hearsay rule. See ...Nevertheless, because we conclude that the error was harmless, we AFFIRM Blechman's convictions. . ...
- Federal Circuits