gun control act of 1968

Receive alerts:
by e-mail
E-mail Your information will be added to a database with the sole purpose of serving your subscription. This database is the exclusive property of vLex Networks S.L. and will never be shared with any other company. By sending your request you accept the Data Protection Policy of vLex Networks S.L. I have read and accept the Terms of Use
via RSS

3.451 documents for gun control act of 1968

- Dangerous criminals or dangerous courts: foreign felonies as predicate offenses under section 922(g) (1) of the Gun Control Act of 1968.
ABSTRACT There is currently a split among U.S. Circuit Courts regarding 18 U.S.C. [section] 922(g)(1), a provision of the Gun Control Act of 1968 th...
- Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
- Vol. 38 Nbr. 1, January 2005
- U.S. Supreme Court: United States V. Hayes
Criminal Procedure Gun Control Act of 1968
- The Daily Record (Baltimore)
- March 17, 2009
- Commentary: Ever Heard of the Lautenberg Amendment? You're Not Alone.
Many criminal defense attorneys have never heard of the Lautenberg Amendment. Some know of its ramifications, just not its name. Because there are so many avid hunters, gun collectors and military personnel in Missouri, it is something every criminal defense attorney should keep in mind when representing a client accused of a domestic violence offense. The Lautenberg Amendment to the Gun Control Act of 1968
- Daily Record and the Kansas City Daily News-Press
- November 05, 2005

- 27 CFR 70.450 - Seizure and forfeiture of personal property.
... seized under Title I of the Gun Control Act of 1968, as amended. For disposal of firearms ...
- Code of Federal Regulations - Title 27: Alcohol, Tobacco Products and Firearms
- Harford Dealer Loses Bid to Resume Selling Guns
A federal judge in Baltimore refused Tuesday to reinstate a Harford County man's federal firearms-dealer license, holding that he willfully committed hundreds of gun-law violations. Charles David Scheuerman's license to sell guns at Bel Air Gun Exchange & Pawn was revoked in 2005 after he repeatedly flouted the record-keeping requirements of the U.S. Gun Control Act of 1968 by failing to properly account for guns acquired or sold - including five he added to his personal collection.
- The Daily Record (Baltimore)
- May 17, 2007
- Second Amendment: Bearing Arms
... OF THE SECOND AMENDMENT (1984); GUN CONTROL AND THE CONSTITUTION: SOURCES AND EXPLORATIONS ON ... measures include the Gun Control Act of 1968. 82 Stat. 226, 18 U.S. C. §§ 921-928. The Suprem...
- Constitution of the United States (Annotated)
- Abbott v. United States, 562 U. S. 2010 (2010)
... 924(c) was enacted as part of the Gun Control Act of 1968, but the “except” clause was not a...
- U.S. Supreme Court
- 27 CFR 70.441 - Applicable laws.
... from the National Firearms Act Amendments of 1968 (82 Stat. 1227), imposes a tax on the making and t...(b) Title I, State Firearms Control Assistance (18 U.S.C., Chapter 44), of the Gun Con...
- Code of Federal Regulations - Title 27: Alcohol, Tobacco Products and Firearms
- Crack Down On Criminals, Not Gun Owners
Unfortunately for the residents of the District of Columbia and Maryland, the actions proposed by Mayor Adrian M. Fenty and Gov. Martin O'Malley will do little to reduce the level of violence occurring in this area ("D.C., Maryland gun task force targets sellers," Page 1, Saturday). Linda Singer, the attorney general for the District, should concentrate on keeping the people who commit crimes incarcerated rather than investigating licensed firearms sellers such as Realco Guns in District Heights, mentioned in the article. I have purchased firearms from Realco. On more than one occasion, I have witnessed the clerk refusing to sell a firearm to an individual whom he suspected of participating in a straw purchase. (A straw purchase is any purchase in which the buyer is not eligible to own ...
- The Washington Times
- July 31, 2007
- Restore Rights of Non-Felons
The Lautenberg Amendment to the Gun Control Act of 1968 became effective Sept. 30, 1996. It potentially affects any soldier, police officer or any other person who has been convicted of domestic violence by voiding his or her right to possess a firearm. Obviously, no one defends the behavior of wife beaters and child abusers. But, the argument is about the punishment fitting the crime. If the penalty for a crime is $50 and no jail time, permanent revocation of an enumerated constitutional right is excessive. If the crime is deserving of revocation of rights, it is deserving of a punishment of more than a year in prison.
- Deseret News (Salt Lake City)
- March 29, 2006