Griswold v Connecticut

8 similar searches for Griswold v Connecticut

Receive alerts:
by e-mail
E-mail Your information will be added to a database with the sole purpose of serving your subscription. This database is the exclusive property of vLex Networks S.L. and will never be shared with any other company. By sending your request you accept the Data Protection Policy of vLex Networks S.L. I have read and accept the Terms of Use
via RSS

1.413 documents for Griswold v Connecticut

- Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965)
U.S. Supreme Court GRISWOLD v. CONNECTICUT, 381 U.S. 479 (1965) 381 U.S. 479 GRISWOLD ET AL. v. CONNECTICUT. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ERR...
- U.S. Supreme Court
- Griswold v. Connecticut
Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479, 85 S. Ct. 1678, 14 L. Ed. 2d 510 (1965), was a landmark Supreme Court decision that re...
- West's Encyclopedia of American Law
- Fri–Jam
- Strange Bedfellows: Criminal Law, Family Law, and the Legal Construction of Intimate Life
Introduction. II. Crime And The Family: The Traditional Narrative. III. The Private Life Of Criminal Law. IV. Strange Bedfellows: Criminal Law And Family Law In State v. Koso. A. The Facts. B. Revealing Criminal Law And Family Law's Cooperative Regulation. C. Producing A Binary View Of Intimate Life. 1. The Prosecution. 2. The Public. 3. The Defense. 4. The Court. D. Reflecting On Koso. V. The Turn Towards Decriminalization. A. Affirming A Binary View Of Intimate Life-Griswold And Loving. 1. Griswold v. Connecticut. 2. Loving v. Virginia. B. Beyond The Binary-Eisenstadt And Lawrence. 1. Eisenstadt v. Baird. 2. Lawrence v. Texas. VI. Sex Without Law?. A. The Persistence Of A Binary View Of Intimate Life. B. The Problem Of Boundary Erosion. C. Reconstituting The Binary Within The Space...
- Iowa Law Review
- Nbr. 94-4, May 2009

- Griswold v. Connecticut 1964
Appellants: Charles Lee Buxton and Estelle T. Griswold Appellee: State of Connecticut Appellants' Claim: That Connecticut'...
- Human Right: ; Birth Control Vital
Believe it or not, birth control once was a crime in America. Early in the 20th century, puritanical Comstock laws made it a prison offense to tell women how to avoid pregnancy. Spunky Margaret Sanger - distressed over wives trapped in endless childbearing - defied those laws, wrote birth control pamphlets and opened a clinic. She was jailed eight times, but never stopped fighting. She was a brave crusader. Some states continued criminalizing birth control for many years. For example, Connecticut made contraceptives a jail offense. Then on June 7, 1965 - a date whose anniversary occurs Tuesday - the U.S. Supreme Court issued a landmark "right of privacy" decision. In a case titled Griswold v. Connecticut, the justices said married couples may practice birth control in the seclusion of t...
- Charleston Gazette
- June 07, 2011
- Ninth Amendment: Unenumerated Rights
... exegesis by several of the Justices in Griswold v. Connecticut. There a statute prohibiting use of...
- Constitution of the United States (Annotated)
- Griswold v. Connecticut 381 U.S. 479 (1965)
Seen in the perspective of the development of constitutional doctrine, Griswold stands among the most influential Supreme Cou...
- Encyclopedia of the American Constitution
- FA-JW
- American Life League Condemns Legacy of Griswold V. Connecticut; Group Blames 40 Years of Moral Decay On Supreme Court Ruling
WASHINGTON, June 7 /U.S. Newswire/ -- "Forty years ago today, the United States Supreme Court handed Planned Parenthood the Griswold v. Connecticut decision and opened Pandora's box by discovering a so- called 'right to privacy' in the penumbra -- the shadows -- of the United States Constitution," said David Bereit, national director of American Life League's STOPP International. "That decision has been responsible for a tragic moral breakdown in our culture, setting the stage for court decisions that decriminalized abortion, and opened the door for children to engage in sexual activity without their parents' knowledge and with the help of Planned Parenthood's products. One can hardly imagine a single Supreme Court decision that has done more damage to our society," added Jim Sedlak, ...
- U.S. Newswire
- June 07, 2005
- Pelosi Statement On the 40th Anniversary of Griswold V. Connecticut
WASHINGTON, June 7 /U.S. Newswire/ -- House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi released the following statement today on the 40th anniversary of Griswold v. Connecticut, the landmark Supreme Court case that recognized the constitutional right to privacy and gave women control over their own reproductive health decisions: The Griswold decision expanded access to family planning and was a victory for women, families, and public health. Over the past 40 years, family planning has been critical to the health of millions of American women and families, preventing unintended pregnancies and sexually transmitted diseases, and reducing the rate of abortion.
- U.S. Newswire
- June 07, 2005
- A thinker-based approach to freedom of speech.
... that it renders the penumbra theory of Griswold (45) and Roe (46) sensible. First, certain substan.... (45.) Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965). . (46.) Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S...
- Constitutional Commentary
- Vol. 27 Nbr. 2, September 2011