The House budget proposal shows a huge gap between the two parties' priorities, and the difference should be made clear to voters. Last week, President Obama offered a spirited defense of his party's values -- in effect, of the legacy of the New Deal and the Great Society. Immediately thereafter, as always happens when Democrats take a stand, the civility police came out in force. The president, we were told, was being too partisan; he needs to treat his opponents with respect; he should have lunch with them, and work out a consensus.
Noah's book deliberately doesn't focus on the poor or the near-poor. For that, we turn to [Tavis Smiley] and DSA Honorary Chair [Cornel West], whose book was sparked by "The Poverty Tour: A Call to Conscience" they organized in August of 2011 and a follow-up symposium, "Remaking America: From Poverty to Prosperity." A central aim of The Rich and the Rest of Us is to make the poor visible again. The book contrasts poverty's treatment as a political issue during the New Deal and the Great Society periods against Reagan's and Clinton's emphasis on "individual responsibility" and character issues. They argue that we are far more likely to respond politically to issues of poverty when we see them as the result of the structure of the economy instead of the effect of the personal qualities of...
In a recent column, I described two forms of conservatism that coalesced in opposition to President Obama's polarizing expansion in the size and role of government. Rejectionist Conservatism, which comes in tea party and libertarian variants, would use current political controversies to fundamentally reorder the role of the federal government. At least in theory, it would repeal not just Obamaism, but also the Great Society, the New Deal and much else in pursuit of a minimal state.
It was nice meeting you, Assemblyman Mike Morrell, at the Sept. 11 ceremony at Chaffey College; you seem like a nice fellow, but why are you so negative about our country? I was aghast when I read in your Sept. 16 Point of View that you feel that FDR's New Deal and LBJ's Great Society were "raw deals for the taxpayers." I recall my grandparents telling me how FDR's Social Security program raised millions of seniors out of poverty and relieved the constant worry of all families in providing for elderly and disabled family members.
The commentary "The nest-egg myth" by Susan Jacoby in your May 22 edition was spot on regarding the inability of many future seniors to provide for their retirement years. While it is undeniable that entitlement programs such as Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid will need adjusting if the social contracts of the New Deal and the Great Society are to be honored, the current Republican budget model authored by Rep. Paul Ryan and adopted by the Republican caucus is not an adjustment -- it is a breach of that contract -- regardless of how long they delay full implementation or how large or small the eventual premium support (vouchers) becomes.
The Bush administration has steadily gutted the democratic regulatory state begun by the New Deal and Great Society. This dogmatic commitment to rapacious corporate domination, combined with the administration's hostility to civil rights, has led to outright attacks on environmental protection, labor rights, public education, and the living standards of low-wage workers. In addition, the right's cultural war in favor of the misnamed "traditional family values" threatens to turn back the crucial gains of the movements for women's and gay and lesbian equality. The Bush administration's continued hold on power for another four years would be a devastating blow to the economic security and cultural freedoms of most Americans, as well as to the prospects for peace and stability in much of th...
The "Ownership Society" seems poised to make a comeback, just in time for the president's second inaugural on Thursday. Some might remember the Ownership Society: It made a brief appearance during last fall's campaign, as the president and his handlers took a half- hearted stab at what the elder George Bush once called "the vision thing," before it vanished from sight like some Republican Atlantis. Yet it still could serve as a useful and inspiring framework with which to package and sell the president's second term agenda. What is an ownership society, as opposed, say, to a Great Society or a New Deal? To our way of thinking, it's a society in which all Americans take a greater ownership stake not just in their personal property and affairs, career choices, health care and retirement, ...
The masses are said to have cried out for relief and to have pressed their political representatives to enact protective legis- lation. [...] emerged, most markedly during the Progressive, New Deal, and Great Society periods, a profusion of government programs, regulatory agencies, and direct government par- ticipation in economic life (divine intervention, as it were), which served to shield the public from the otherwise crushing weight of brutal laissez-faire capitalism. The nineteenth century's dominant ideology, a distinctly American version of laissez faire, seemed increasingly unable to restrain this grasping for economic advantage via enlarged government power.
Popular presidential history prefers sound bites to epic narratives. FDR brought us the New Deal; Lyndon Johnson, the Great Society; while Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush both helped usher in the end of the Cold War - all remarkable accomplishments. Yet their real stories include many more chapters. These presidents changed more than history's top headlines. And the current occupant of the White House is no exception. Prosecuting the global war on terror - including the response to the September 11 terrorist attacks - will no doubt fill many pages of President George W. Bush's narrative. But for the next two days, the White House is hosting an event that should better frame an underreported part of President Bush's legacy, his Faith-Based and Community Initiatives program. The confer...
With Republican fortunes dipping along with President Bush's poll numbers, some prognosticators think a perfect storm is forming for the Democrats in the mid-term elections. But to tear down a fortification like the existing Republican- run Congress, the Democrats need a clear and concise program - like Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal, the Kennedy-Johnson New Frontier and Great Society, the Ronald Reagan anti-tax revolution or even the Newt Gingrich Contract with America.
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2013, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other interesting searches:
John Safa | English Law | Alumax Inc. | But The Mail | guillain-barre syndrome | brie picardie | Renuncia a la candidatura | ejemplo iter criminis | gouyer | Energia di origine agricola
