grand jury selection

Receive alerts:
by e-mail
E-mail Your information will be added to a database with the sole purpose of serving your subscription. This database is the exclusive property of vLex Networks S.L. and will never be shared with any other company. By sending your request you accept the Data Protection Policy of vLex Networks S.L. I have read and accept the Terms of Use
via RSS

5.591 documents for grand jury selection

- State v. Jackson, (Ohio 2006)
CRIMINAL LAW: capital murder; postconviction relief; R.C. 2953.21 et seq.; civil discovery; appointment of experts; no constitutional right to counsel; duty of state to provide discovery in postconviction; personal knowledge of trial judge; judicial notice of prior proceeding; breakdown of attorney-client relationship; no right to "rapport" with attorney; res judicata; discrimination in selection of grand jury and petit jury; discrimination in prosecution of death penalty cases; ineffective assistance of counsel; use of lethal injection; lack of substantive grounds for relief; failure to release exculpatory evidence prior to trial; need for mitigation specialist; psychologist's theory of case; calculation of I.Q.; adequate investigation of case; change in counsel prior to mitigation ph...
- Ohio Supreme Court
- State v. Hughbanks, (Ohio 2003)
Appellate Review - Postconviction;The court of appeals had no jurisdiction to review the common pleas court’s denial of petitioner’s motion seeking the recusal or disqualification of the county’s common pleas judges from ruling upon his postconviction petition, when the state’s constitution confers solely upon the chief justice of the supreme court the authority to determine the disqualification of a common pleas judge. The common pleas court properly dismissed under the doctrine of res judicata petitioner’s postconviction claims challenging as discriminatory the county’s grand-jury-foreperson selection process, challenging the legality of both the grand jury that had indicted him and the indictment, and challenging the constitutionality of various aspects of Ohio’s death-penalty schem...
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Will the Brooklyn Federal Court Protect Tawana Brawley?
This has been New York's behavior since [Tawana Brawley] was found on November 28, 1987 with "nigger" and "KKK" written on her body, which was smeared with feces. She was unconscious. Four days earlier, she had been abducted. [Robert Abrams] failed to document her whereabouts during this period. Yet, he, and not the grand jury, found a "hoax. [Charles Schumer] is the ranking member of the Senate subcommittee for the selection of federal judges. Schumer and [Hillary Clinton] can also recommend persons for federal judgeships in New York. They are working with [George W. Bush] to put "law and order" and "strict constructionist" federal judges in this state. Stroock & Stroock & Lavan began as an old-line Jewish firm that represented many 'Our Crowd' families," as described by Erwi...
- New York Amsterdam News
- August 12, 2009

- Hobby v. United States, 468 U.S. 339 (1984)
... ground that there was discrimination in the grand jury selection process in violation of the Due Pro...
- U.S. Supreme Court
- State v. Jackson, (Ohio 2006)
CRIMINAL LAW: capital murder; postconviction relief; R.C. 2953.21 et seq.; civil discovery; appointment of experts; no constitutional right to counsel; duty of state to provide discovery in postconviction; personal knowledge of trial judge; judicial notice of prior proceeding; breakdown of attorney-client relationship; no right to "rapport" with attorney; res judicata; discrimination in selection of grand jury and petit jury; discrimination in prosecution of death penalty cases; ineffective assistance of counsel; use of lethal injection; lack of substantive grounds for relief; failure to release exculpatory evidence prior to trial; need for mitigation specialist; psychologist's theory of case; calculation of I.Q.; adequate investigation of case; change in counsel prior to mitigation ph...
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Campbell v. Louisiana, 523 U.S. 392 (1998)
...A grand jury in Evangeline Parish, Louisiana, indicted pet... been violated by discrimination in the selection of a federal grand jury foreperson whose duties we...
- U.S. Supreme Court
- Thomas C. Ramseur, Appellant, v. Howard C. Beyer, Superintendent, New Jersey State Prison, Robert Del Tufo, New Jersey Attorney General., 983 F.2d 1215 (3rd Cir. 1992)
...ROTH, Circuit Judge. During the selection of the grand jury which indicted appellant, Thomas...
- Federal Circuits
- Castaneda v. Partida, 430 U.S. 482 (1977)
... Under Texas' "key man" system for selecting grand juries, jury commissioners are appointed by a stat... on his claim of discrimination in the selection of the grand jury that had indicted him, he filed ...
- U.S. Supreme Court
- Rose v. Mitchell, 443 U.S. 545 (1979)
..., who are Negroes, were indicted by a county grand jury in Tennessee for murder. They filed a plea in... who testified only as to the selection of the grand jury venire; 2 former foreman who tes...
- U.S. Supreme Court
- Vasquez v. Hillery, 474 U.S. 254 (1986)
... . In 1962, a California grand jury indicted respondent for murder. Before trial ...Intentional discrimination in the selection of grand jurors is a grave constitutional trespass...
- U.S. Supreme Court