-
U.S. Supreme Court GIDEON v. WAINWRIGHT, 372 U.S. 335 (1963) 372 U.S. 335
GIDEON v. WAINWRIGHT, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME C...
-
"The rhetoric of the Sixth Amendment is grand; the reality is grim."1
-Pamela R. Metzger
"The right of one charged with cri...
-
Petitioner: Clarence Earl Gideon
Respondent: Louie L. Wainwright
Petitioner's Claim: The Sixth Amendment right to legal c...
-
Q&A
What is your favorite Supreme Court case or decision of all time and why? Gideon v. Wainwright. It's a great story about a man writing a letter to the Supreme Court and getting justice. But at the same time, it's also about how difficult it is for a criminal defendant to understand his rights and have a fair trial without the help of a lawyer.
-
Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 83 S. Ct. 792, 9 L. Ed. 2d 799, is a 1963 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established an ...
-
The U.S. Supreme Court says I am entitled to be represented by counsel," the accused told the judge in anticipation of his trial for the crime of burg...
-
From time to time in constitutional history an obscure individual becomes the symbol of a great movement in legal doctrine. Characte...
-
You would think 46 years is enough time for New York to live up to the promise that everyone charged with a crime has the right to effective counsel, as the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in the landmark 1963 Gideon v. Wainwright case.
Think again. Despite our self-professed commitment to equal justice, New York's county-based system of public defense has been declared an "ongoing crisis" by a commission named by former Chief Judge Judith S. Kaye. That report found a fractured, inefficient, underfunded and overburdened system, where undertrained lawyers try to handle unmanageable caseloads.
-
'Gideon' anniversary
Legislators and advocates gathered in Albany Wednesday on 46th Anniversary of Gideon v. Wainwright to call for an independent public defense commission to reform New York's county-based system of public defense
-
A pretrial review of a lawyer's effectiveness in representing clients should be augmented to the existing post-trial review. Gideon v. Wainwright's promise of effective counsel was restricted by Strickland v. Washington's requirement of reviewing the post-trial record. The proper focus is on the right to a fair trial which includes parity in the effectiveness of counsel throughout the trial process.