General Telephone Company of Ohio

• State Corporation Commission of the State of Kansas, Petitioner, v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Respondents, American Telephone and Telegraph Company, General Telephone Company of Florida, Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Company, Northwestern Bell Telephone and Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Company, Mci Telecommunications Corporation, Bellsouth Corporation on Behalf of Its Operating Companies--Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Company, and South Central Bell Telephone Company; the Bell Atlantic Telephone Companies--the Bell Telephone Company of Pennsylvania, the Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Companies of Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, and District of Columbia, the Diamond State Telephone Company, and New Jersey Bell Telephone Company; the Ameritech Operating Companies--Illinois Bell Telephone Company, Indiana Bell Telephone Company, Michigan Bell Telephone Company, the Ohio Bell Telephone Company and Wisconsin Bell; the Nynex Telephone ..., 787 F.2d 1421 (10th Cir. 1986)

Lee H. Woodard, Special Counsel, of Woodard, Blaylock, Hernandez, Pilgreen & Roth, Wichita, Kan. (Brian J. Moline, General Counsel, and James G. Flahe...

• Federal Circuits

• General Telephone Company of California Et Al., Appellants, v. Federal Communications Commission, Appellee, Storer Broadcasting Company, Teleprompter Corporation, National Cable Television Assn., Inc., United States of America, Intervenors. United Inter-Mountain Telephone Company Et Al., Appellants, v. Federal Communications Commission, Appellee, Storer Broadcasting Company, Teleprompter Corporation, Et Al., Sterling Information Services, Ltd., National Cable Television Assn., Inc., United States of America, Intervenors. United Telephone Company of Ohio Et Al., Appellants, v. Federal Communications Commission, Appellee, Storer Broadcasting Company, Warrensburg Cable, Inc., Teleprompter Corporation, Et Al., Sterling Information Services, Ltd., National Cable Television Assn., Inc., United States of America, Intervenors. the Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company of Virginia Et Al., Petitioners, v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Respondents, Teleprompter Corporation, Inc.,..., 413 F.2d 390 (D.C. Cir. 1969)

Mr. David H. Lloyd, Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. Paul A. Porter, Reed Miller and Robert D. Rosenbaum, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for ...

• Federal Circuits

• Gas distribution companies.

..., Logan and Scott ARKANSAS WESTERN GAS COMPANY P.O. Box 13288 Fayetteville, AR 72703-1002 Phone: ... System: MDT's, Cell, Radio Telephone System Capacity: 217,774 MMcf throughput Total Hor... of Customers: 500,000 Area Served: Southwest Ohio, Northern Kentucky and Southeast Indiana CITIZENS ...gun. counsel, James Hinchliff, general counsel, Charles L. Thompson, vp gas op Subsidiari...

• Pipeline & Gas Journal
• Vol. 229 Nbr. 9, September 2002

• Ad Visor, Inc., a California Corporation, and O'Connor Agency, Inc., a California Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company, a California Corporation, General Telephone Company of California, a California Corporation, General Telephone Directory Company, a Delaware Corporation, and National Yellow Pages Service Association, an Unincorporated Association, Defendants, L. M. Berry & Company, an Ohio Corporation, Defendant-Appellant., 640 F.2d 1107 (9th Cir. 1981)

Robert E. Currie, Newport Beach, Cal., for defendant-appellant. Harry L. Gershon, Richards, Watson, Dreyfuss & Gershon, Los Angeles, Cal., for plain...

• Federal Circuits

• Automation and the Fourth Amendment

The Supreme Court has held that an individual relinquishes any Fourth Amendment interest in information that he or she voluntarily discloses to a third party. Known as the "Third Party Doctrine," this controversial rule is increasingly problematic in an age where a large proportion of personal communications and transactions are carried out over the Internet. Internet users expose virtually all of the information they generate online-e-mails, web-surfing histories, search terms, and more-to online service providers. As such, many scholars have assumed that Internet information will be unprotected by the Fourth Amendment. Yet the information disclosed to these online third parties is generally not exposed to human beings at all; rather, it is processed entirely by automated equipment. Ne...

• Iowa Law Review
• Nbr. 96-2, January 2011

• Eighth Coast Guard District Annual Marine Events and Safety Zones

The Coast Guard is amending and updating its special local regulations and safety zones relating to recurring marine parades, regattas, fireworks displays, and other events that take place in the Eighth Coast Guard District area of responsibility. This rule informs the public of regularly scheduled marine parades, regattas, fireworks displays, and other annual events. When these special local regulations and safety zones are enforced, marine traffic is restricted in specified areas. The purpose of this rule is to reduce administrative costs involved in producing a separate rule for each individual recurring event and to provide notice of the known recurring events requiring a special local regulation or safety zone throughout the year. This rule will also help to protect event participa...

...The telephone number is 202-366-9329. To avoid duplication, ... Table No. Ohio Date Event/sponsor Sector... Paddling Company. the Shed Barbeque. 91......... 165.801. (a) In accordance with the general regulations in Sec. 165 of this part, entry into ...

• Federal Register Nbr. 77 FR 12456, March 01, 2012
• Rules and Regulations
• Homeland Security Department

• National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner, v. North Arkansas Electric Cooperative, Inc., Respondent., 412 F.2d 324 (8th Cir. 1969)

... of 'managerial employees' in Ford Motor Company, 66 N.L.R.B. No. 1317, 17 L.R.R.M. 394 (1946). In ... insofar as they discuss the problem generally. The Court said in Retail Clerks:. 'The Board has ...1177 (1967); Gulf States Telephone Co., 118 N.L.R.B. No. 141, 40 L.R.R.M. 1309 (1957)); General Telephone Company of Ohio, 112 N.L.R.B. No. 152, 36 L.R.R.M. 1178 (1955). It...

• Federal Circuits

• General Telephone Co., of Ohio, 94 (1980)

General Telephone Company of Ohio and International Brotherhood of Electrica...

• National Labor Relations Board

• Unpublished Disposition Notice: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(C) States that Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. Ruth Gilliland, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. General Telephone Co. of Ohio; Trustees of General Telephone Co. of Ohio Pension Plan, Defendants-Appellees., 767 F.2d 920 (6th Cir. 1985)

... judgment for defendant General Telephone Company of Ohio (GTC). Plaintiff was a part-time employee ...

• Federal Circuits

• Frontier Takes Over Phone Lines Today

When Verizon switches over more than 626,000 telephone access lines in West Virginia to Frontier Communications today, residential and small-business customers shouldnt notice a change provided everything works out as planned. This is my third system cutover of similar scale and scope, and Im confident this will be the best weve done, said Ken Arndt, vice president of Frontiers Southeast region. We dont expect any issues or problems. We believe we have all the Is dotted and Ts crossed. But just in case, Stamford, Conn.-based Frontier has sent 250 employees to Charleston this week to ensure the transition goes smoothly. Frontier workers also have set up nine command centers throughout Charleston where employees are preparing for todays switch. Each center represents a specific Frontier ...

• Charleston Gazette
• July 01, 2010