-
[299 U.S.App.D.C. 282] Petition for Review of an Order of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
Dan H. McCrary, with whom Rodney O. Mundy, Birmin...
-
DUBLIN -- Research and Markets (http://www.researchandmarkets.com/research/ade947/florida_public_uti) has announced the addition of the "Florida Publi...
-
DUBLIN -- Research and Markets (http://www.researchandmarkets.com/research/7ff7df/florida_public_uti) has announced the addition of the "FLORIDA PUBLI...
-
... Applicants: Bangor Hydro-Electric Company, Florida Power & Light Company--New England Divisiion, Maine Public Utilities Commission v. Central Maine Power Compan...
-
Robert Y. Patterson, Jr., Winter Park, Fla., Leon M. Payne, Houston, Tex., Robert M. Scott, Washington, D.C., Andrews, Kurth, Campbell & Jones, Housto...
-
- the State of New York, the County of Allegany, New York and the County of Cortland, New York, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. the United States of America; James D. Watkins, as Secretary of Energy; Kenneth M. Carr, as Chairman of the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission; the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission; Samuel K. Skinner, as Secretary of Transportation; and Richard Thornburgh, as United States Attorney General, Defendants-Appellees, State of Washington; State of Nevada; and State of South Carolina, Intervenors-Appellees, American College of Nuclear Physicians; Arizona Public Service Company; Baltimore Gas & Electric Company; California Radioactive Materials Management Forum, Inc.; Commonwealth Edison Company; Florida Power & Light Company; Gulf States Utilities Company; Mallinkrodt Medical, Inc.; Pacific Gas & Electric Co.; Public Service Company of Colorado; Society of Nuclear Medicine; Southern California Edison Co., Amici Curiae., 942 F.2d 114 (2nd Cir. 1991)
Peter Schiff, Deputy Sol. Gen., State of N.Y. (Robert Abrams, Atty. Gen., O. Peter Sherwood, Sol. Gen., John McConnell, Asst. Atty. Gen., of counsel) ...
-
* Florida Power & Light Company: Based on the new charges, the total monthly electric bill for residential customers using 1,000 kwh will decrease from the current charge of $110.72 to $95.43. The fuel portion of the bill will decrease by $13.66. The bill also contains decreases in the following cost recovery clauses: $1.95 in capacity and $0.15 in energy conservation. Environmental cost recovery will increase by $0.85 and the gross receipts tax will decrease by $0.38.
* Tampa Electric Company: Based on the new charges, the total monthly electric bill for residential customers using 1,000 kwh will decrease from the current charge of $114.67 to $113.21. The fuel portion of the bill will decrease by $6.32. The bill also contains these cost recovery clause changes: a $2.63 increase in ...
TALLAHASSEE, FL - Florida's Public Service Commission (PSC) approved a refond of more...Utilities are allowed to recover the prudently incurred fuel...
-
Abe Fortas, Washington, D.C., for petitioner in No. 22089.
Leon M. Payne, Houston, Tex., for petitioner in Nos. 22089, 21957 and 21964.
Robert Y. Pat...
-
..., Logan and Scott ARKANSAS WESTERN GAS COMPANY P.O. Box 13288 Fayetteville, AR 72703-1002 Phone: ...AUSTIN UTILITIES 500 Fourth Ave. N.E. P.O. Box 366 Austin, MN 55912... central New York NIPSCO NORTHERN INDIANA PUBLIC SERVICE CO. 801 E 86th Ave. Merrillville, IN 46410...: Elizabeth Gas Company, City Gas Co of Florida, North Carolina Gas, Elleton Gas, Valley Cities Ga...
-
- Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., New York Power Authority, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation, Arizona Public Service Corporation, Commonwealth Edison Company, Duke Energy Corporation, Entergy Gulf States, Inc., Florida Power Corporation, Florida Power and Light Company, Gpu Nuclear, Inc. (on Behalf of Jersey Central Power & Light Company, Metropolitan Edison Company, and Pennsylvania Electric Company), Indiana Michigan Power Company, Nebraska Public Power District, Peco Energy Company, Southern California Edison Company, Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc., System Fuels, Inc., Texas Utilities Electric Company, Virginia Electric & Power Company, Washington Public Power Supply System, Wisconsin Public Service Corporation, and Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation (on Behalf of Kansas City Power & Light Company, Kansas Electric Power Cooperative, Inc., and Kansas Gas and Electric Company), Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. United States, Department of Energ..., 247 F.3d 1378 (Fed. Cir. 2001)
Appealed from: United States District Court for the Southern District of New York; Senior Judge Whitman KnappDaniel R. Murdock, Winston & Strawn, of N...
