federal communications commission v. pacifica foundation

Receive alerts:
by e-mail
E-mail Your information will be added to a database with the sole purpose of serving your subscription. This database is the exclusive property of vLex Networks S.L. and will never be shared with any other company. By sending your request you accept the Data Protection Policy of vLex Networks S.L. I have read and accept the Terms of Use
via RSS

206 documents for federal communications commission v. pacifica foundation

- Federal Communications Commission v. Pacifica Foundation 1978
Petitioner: Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Respondents: Pacifica Foundation, et al. Petitioner's Claim: That the...
- Pacifica Foundation, Petitioner, v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Respondents., 556 F.2d 9 (D.C. Cir. 1977)
Harry M. Plotkin, Washington, D. C., with whom Thomas Schattenfield, David F. Tillotson and Mary Candace Fowler, Washington, D. C., were on the brief ...
- Federal Circuits
- United States v. Playboy Entertainment Group, Inc.-Sexually Explicit Signal Bleed and § 505 of the CDA: Unable to Overcome Strict Scrutiny...But Will Strict Scrutiny be Able to Overcome the Future?
Introduction. II. Relevant Precedent. A. Miller v. California. B. Federal Communications Commission v. Pacifica Foundation. C. Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc. D. Sable Communications of California, Inc. v. FCC. E. Denver Area Educational Telecommunications Consortium, Inc. v. FCC. III. United States v. Playboy Entertainment Group, INC. A. Procedural Background. B. Factual Background. 1. Sexually Oriented Cable Programming and the Phenomenon of Signal Bleed. 2. Section 505 of the Communications Decency Act. 3. Section 504 of the Communications Decency Act. C. The Supreme Court Strikes Down Section 505. 1. The Majority Opinion. a. Constitutional Standard: Strict Scrutiny. b. Section 505 Fails to Satisfy Strict Scrutiny. c. The Government Failed to Show that Signal Bleed is a Pervas...
- Capital University Law Review
- Nbr. 30-4, December 2002

- Offensive language in prime-time television: four years after television age and content ratings.
...While television networks and the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) do occasionally fie... activities or organs" (Federal Communications Commission v. Pacifica Foundation, 1978). In 1987 ...
- Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media
- Vol. 48 Nbr. 4, December 2004
- Action for Children'S Television; American Civil Liberties Union; the Association of Independent Television Stations, Inc.; Capital City/American Broadcasting Co., Inc.; Cbs, Inc.; Fox Television Stations, Inc.; Greater Media, Inc.; Infinity Broadcasting Corporation; Motion Picture Association of America, Inc.; National Association of Broadcasters; National Public Radio; People for the American Way; Post-Newsweek Stations, Inc.; Public Broadcasting Service; Radio-Television News Directors Association; Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press; Society of Professional Journalists, Petitioners, v. Federal Communications Commission; United States of America, Respondents. Pacifica Foundation; National Federation of Community Broadcasters; American Public Radio; National Association of College Broadcasters; Intercollegiate Broadcast System; Pen American Center; Allen Ginsberg, Petitioners, v. Federal Communications Commission; United States of America, Respondents., 58 F.3d 654 (D.C. Cir. 1995)
Petitions for Review of an Order of the Federal Communications Commission. Timothy B. Dyk, with whom Barbara McDowell was on the briefs, argued the c...
- Federal Circuits
- Federal Communications Commission v. Pacifica Foundation 438 U.S. 726 (1978)
In FCC v. Pacifica Foundation the Court held that limited civil sanctions could constitutionally be invoked against a radio br...
- Encyclopedia of the American Constitution
- FA-JW
- League of Women Voters of California, Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, and Pacifica Foundation, Et Al., Plaintiffs, v. Federal Communications Commission, Defendant-Appellee., 751 F.2d 986 (9th Cir. 1985)
Fredric D. Woocher, Center for Law in the Public Interest, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants. Anthony J. Steinmeyer, Michael Jay Singer, D...
- Federal Circuits
- When does F*** not mean F***?: FCC v. Fox Television Stations and a call for protecting emotive speech.
...FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION V. FOX TELEVISION STATIONS, INC III. ANTECEDENTS T...Cohen and Emotive Speech B. Pacifica and "Words You Never Say" IV. CHAPLINSKY, COHEN AN...Pacifica Foundation, upholding sanctions for a mid-afternoon broadcast...
- Federal Communications Law Journal
- Vol. 64 Nbr. 1, December 2011
- League of Women Voters of California, Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, and Pacifica Foundation, and Henry Waxman, Plaintiffs, v. Federal Communications Commission, Defendant-Appellee., 798 F.2d 1255 (9th Cir. 1986)
Fredric D. Woocher, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants. Michael Jay Singer, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for defendant-appellee. App...
- Federal Circuits
- Popular Free Speech Skepticism and the Benevolent rise of Liberal Censorship
Liberal Censorship Theory. Unprotected Speech. From Safeguards to Skeptics. Ideological Drift and Unlikely Coalitions. The Irony of Liberal Censorship.

... "violates the spirit and intent of the federal Fair Housing Act, 7 which generally prohibits resi... media is set forth in Federal Communications Commission v. Pacifica Foundation, involving the r...
- The Modern American
- Nbr. II-3, December 2006