© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
- Language
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
The modern law of federal habeas corpus is a labyrinth of counterfactuals and arcane procedural hurdles that few state petitioners manage to navigate. The convoluted inquiries required arise from the need to reconcile three developments of the past four decades that remain in tension with one another: 1. the Warren Court's expansion of federal habeas relief, identified with Fay v. Noia and its progeny, 2. the Burger and Rehnquist Courts' curtailment of that expansion, identified with Wainwright v. Sykes, which partially overruled Fay, and Coleman v. Thompson, which fully overruled it, and 3. the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA). AEDPA to a certain extent codified, and to another extent modified, judicial developments of the preceding four decades. By common ...
...Noia , dealt with the important issue of state default...
...Noia, 372 U.S. 391 (1963), under which a federal habe...
... Fay v. Noia , 372 U. S. 391, 435-438. Pp. 3-5. . (b) Lawrence ...
...Ross, 468 U. S. 1, 9 (1984);Fay v. Noia, 372 U. S. 391, 430 (1963), overruled in partby Sy...
...Noia, 372 U.S. 391, . [Page 433 U.S. 72, 73] . which...
...Noia, 372 U. S. 391 , 446, n. 2 (1963) (Clark, J., dis...
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company