-
This Comment discusses Regulation FD in the context of its first application in federal district court. It analyzes the facts from which the SEC's claim arose. It also discusses the basis for Siebel's motion to dismiss the case and the SEC's arguments in favor of continued litigation. The article discusses the district court's interpretation of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and the effects of this interpretation. Finally, this Comment analyzes the district court's dismissal of the case and the public policy that supports the district court's decision. The SEC must have sensed the futility of the arguments it made in Siebel Systems, as it allowed the deadline for appealing the district court's judgment on Siebel's motion to dismiss to lapse. Since the district court's dismissa...
-
The Baltimore City Paper did not defame a nightclub owner by reporting that some people thought he could have been involved in a double murder, an appellate court has affirmed.
Even if a pair of articles contained defamatory material, the Court of Special Appeals held, the paper and its reporter were protected by the fair reporting and fair comment privileges.
-
A form of qualified privilege applied to news media publications relating to discussion of matters that are of legitimate concern...
-
Title X of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act) transferred rulemaking authority for a number of consumer financial protection laws from seven Federal agencies to the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (Bureau) as of July 21, 2011. The Bureau is in the process of republishing the regulations implementing those laws with technical and conforming changes to reflect the transfer of authority and certain other changes made by the Dodd-Frank Act. In light of the transfer of certain rulemaking authority for the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) from the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Federal Trade Commission, National Credit Union Administration, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, a...
... final rule with request for public comment. -------------------------------------------------...
-
News reports suggesting that a defamation plaintiff was involved in a double murder fell within the fair reporting and fair comment privileges, Maryland's highest court has ruled in affirming judgment.
The defendants are a newspaper and one of the paper's reporters. The defendants published two articles concerning a double murder in Baltimore. Both articles suggested that the plaintiff may have been involved in the murders, despite the fact that he was never charged. The reports relied on both the plaintiff's testimony at the murder trial as well a witness statement discovered in a law enforcement investigative file.
-
With unemployment above 8 percent for 38 consecutive months, it is no surprise that our offices receive questions and concerns about employment from constituents. Where are the jobs? Where can I go to look for a job? Can you help me find work? The reality is there are many jobs available going unfilled. Last week, the jobs section on courierpress.com listed hundreds of jobs for Evansville, from executive level positions with annual salaries above $100,000 to dock workers, truck drivers, store managers, nurses and engineers.
While we remain steadfast in our efforts to attract and retain employers to Southwestern Indiana, it is important to communicate directly with our friends and neighbors currently unemployed and provide necessary resources to get them back to work. One of t...
-
HOMICIDE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW/CRIMINAL COMPLICITY EVIDENCE JURIES JURY INSTRUCTIONS PROSECUTOR R.C. 2941.25 NEW TRIAL: The trial court did not err in overruling the defendants motion to suppress his confession where the state demonstrated that the interrogation was short in duration, there was no coercion, and the defendant affirmatively indicated his willingness to give a statement. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting a murder victims statement as a present sense impression where the decedent had repeated to a witness threats made by the defendant over the telephone immediately after the telephone conversation had ended. The defendant did not demonstrate prosecutorial misconduct where the prosecutors allegedly improper statements were a fair co...
... {¶20} He first argues that improper comments by the prosecutor during closing arguments dep...
-
Decision Will Be Clear Indicator for Future of Immigration Reform
WASHINGTON, Dec. 8, 2010 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The Federation for American Immigration Reform is providing around-the- clock forecasting and analysis of today's expected Senate (S. 3992) and House (HR 6497) votes on the DREAM Act. The Senate version is expected late this afternoon with a subsequent vote in the House shortly thereafter.
-
LOS ANGELES After he was seriously wounded in a 1981 assassination attempt, Ronald Reagan described the experience simply in one of his presidential diaries: "Getting shot hurts.
That excerpt and many others form a portrait of an uncomplicated and amiable man who despite occasional periods of worry and bursts of temper took his eight years in the White House pretty much in stride.
-
Title X of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act) transferred rulemaking authority for a number of consumer financial protection laws from seven Federal agencies to the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (Bureau) as of July 21, 2011. The Bureau is in the process of republishing the regulations implementing those laws with technical and conforming changes to reflect the transfer of authority and certain other changes made by the Dodd-Frank Act. In light of the transfer of the Federal Trade Commission's (Commission's) rulemaking authority for the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) to the Bureau, the Bureau is publishing for public comment an interim final rule establishing a new Regulation F (Fair Debt Collection Practices Act). This in...