expert testimony daubert

Receive alerts:
by e-mail
E-mail Your information will be added to a database with the sole purpose of serving your subscription. This database is the exclusive property of vLex Networks S.L. and will never be shared with any other company. By sending your request you accept the Data Protection Policy of vLex Networks S.L. I have read and accept the Terms of Use
via RSS

2.569 documents for expert testimony daubert

- Expert testimony after Daubert ...
Meeting reliability standards in case A doesn't give a CPA witness a leg up in case B. At the fall 2000 AICPA Advanced Litigation Services Conferenc...
- Journal of Accountancy
- Vol. 192 Nbr. 1, July 2001
- Gilmore v. Village Green Mgt. Co., (Ohio 2008)
Summary judgment; expert testimony; Daubert hearing; motion in limine.
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Deloitte & Touche Launches Study/Database That Tracks Admissibility of Financial Expert Testimony Since 1993 'Daubert Decision'.
Business Editors CHICAGO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Aug. 7, 2003 A new electronic database designed to help litigators analyze and track the application of...
- Business Wire
- August 07, 2003

- State v. Harris, (Ohio 2008)
Sufficient evidence; expert testimony; Daubert hearing.
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Accountants Considerations of Daubert-Related Decisions on Valuation Expert Testimony.
Introduction Accountants are often called upon to perform litigation support services, including expert testimony on valuation and economic damages....
- The National Public Accountant
- Vol. 45 Nbr. 8, October 2000
- Hazard v. Klein, (Ohio 2007)
Medical malpractice (breast cancer detection), wrongful death, harmless error, substantial justice, proximate cause, expert testimony, Daubert, Valentine.
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Non-Traditional Uses of Daubert: A Review of Recent Case Law[Dagger]
In the landmark 1993 decision Daubert v Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, the US Supreme Court replaced the Frye standard for admissibility of expert testimony and held that Federal Rule of Evidence 702 provides the standard for admitting scientific testimony in a federal trial. Daubert entrusted judges with the role of "gatekeepers" of scientific expert testimony and established several criteria for judges to consider when evaluating whether to admit scientific evidence. Daubert involved a product liability claim, and since 1993, product liability suits have comprised the vast majority of cases involving Daubert challenges to admissibility of scientific testimony. However, in Kumho Tire v Carmichael, the Supreme Court rejected the argument that Daubert applies only to scientific testimony. ...
- FDCC Quarterly
- Vol. 60 Nbr. 1, October 2009
- State v. Wooden, (Ohio 2008)
voluntariness of confession, suppression, expert testimony, assistance to jury of expert testimony, Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (1993), 509 U.S. 579, 25 L.Ed.2d 469
- Ohio Supreme Court
- The impact of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., on expert testimony: with applications to securities litigation.
Daubert began a wide-ranging debate about the rules that govern the admissibility in both state and federal trials. When the U. S. Supreme Court han...
- Florida Bar Journal
- Vol. 73 Nbr. 3, March 1999
- Admissibility and reliability of expert scientific testimony after Daubert.
The US Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc has provided lower courts more concrete guidelines for the admissibility of scientific testimony in toxic tort cases. The court replaced the Kelly-Frye standard of general acceptance by the scientific community with a more exact test, which allows scientific evidence that has results which can be uniformly duplicated and have withstood scrutiny by peers. By focusing on reliability factors, the Daubert standard is more consistent with the admissibility requirements of Federal Rules of Evidence 702 and 703.
- Defense Counsel Journal
- Vol. 61 Nbr. 1, January 1994