exclusive licensee right to sue

Receive alerts:
by e-mail
E-mail Your information will be added to a database with the sole purpose of serving your subscription. This database is the exclusive property of vLex Networks S.L. and will never be shared with any other company. By sending your request you accept the Data Protection Policy of vLex Networks S.L. I have read and accept the Terms of Use
via RSS

738 documents for exclusive licensee right to sue

- 10 CFR 81.32 - Terms of exclusive license grant.
... provide a reasonable incentive for the licensee to invest the necessary risk capital to bring the ... be subject to an irrevocable, royalty-free right of the Government of the United States to practice...
- Code of Federal Regulations - Title 10: Energy
- 10 CFR 781.71 - Litigation.
... 781.71 - Litigation. (a) An exclusive or partially exclusive licensee may be granted thee right to sue at his own expense any party who infringes ...
- Code of Federal Regulations - Title 10: Energy
- Mercado-Salinas v. Bart Enterprises, (1st Cir. 2011)
... the Agreement, Mercado granted Bart the right to use the. "Walter Mercado" trademark, as well as..., Mercado "grant[ed] to Bart the exclusive right. and license during the Term and throughout ... typically inure to assignees, not licensees. See, e.g., 15. U.S.C. §§ 1051(a)(1), 1127 (all...
- Federal Circuits

- The ABCs of Licensing Intellectual Property.
Intellectual property rights broadly encompass patents, trade secrets, know-how... the transfer of rights if the buyer (licensee) doesn't live up to its end of the bargain. In man...The grant can be exclusive (i.e., only the licensee has the right to exploit ...
- Mondaq Business Briefing
- Nbr. 2010, January 2010
- Propat International Corp., Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant, and David Fink and Helene Glasser, Counterclaim Defendants, v. Rpost, Inc. and Rpost Us, Inc., Defendant/Counterclaimant-Cross Appellant, and Rpost International Limited, Zafar Khan, Kenneth Barton and Terrance Tomkow, Defendants-Cross Appellants., 473 F.3d 1187 (Fed. Cir. 2007)
... does not transfer all substantial rights in the patent to Propat but instead merely makes PPropat a bare licensee under the patent. Because Propat has no proprietar... with respect to the invention is not exclusive, because Authentix retains the right to seek new p...
- Federal Circuits
- Licensor Retains Standing to Sue Because Exclusive License Not a Virtual Assignment of Patents
... AMF had transferred to AB all substantial rights under the patents, AB should be considered the own... typical situation in which an exclusive licensee sues an accused infringer and the Court must decid...
- Mondaq Business Briefing
- United States Law Articles in English
- Propat International Corp., et al. v. Rpost, Inc., et al., (Fed. Cir. 2007)
... does not transfer all substantial rights in the patent to Propat but instead merely makes PPropat a bare licensee under the patent. Because Propat has no proprietar... with respect to the invention is not exclusive, because Authentix retains the right to seek new p...
- Federal Circuits
- HyperQuest v. N'Site Solutions, (7th Cir. 2011)
...a non-exclusive license to certain copyrighted software, called eD...Eventually, Safelite granted rights in the eDoc program to HyperQuest; when it did so,... conclusion that it was not an exclusive licensee (and thus not entitled to assert a claim for copyr...
- Federal Circuits
- Alfred E. Mann Foundation for Scientific Research v. Cochlear Corp., (2010)
... cochlear implants, granting AB an exclusive license to the patents that AMF later accused Coch...AB the sole right to sue for infringement of those patents. We find... of those patents to the exclusive licensee, conferring standing to sue solely on the licensee...
- United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
- Michael Gardner and Bien Licensing Agency, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Nike, Inc., Defendant-Appellee., 279 F.3d 774 (9th Cir. 2002)
... Appellants lacked standing because the licensee, Sony Music Entertainment Corporation ("Sony"), diid not have the right to transfer its rights to Gardner under the exclus... than records,2 Nike transferred the exclusive, perpetual, worldwide right to Sony to use MC Teac...
- Federal Circuits