ex parte communication

7 similar searches for ex parte communication

Receive alerts:
by e-mail
E-mail Your information will be added to a database with the sole purpose of serving your subscription. This database is the exclusive property of vLex Networks S.L. and will never be shared with any other company. By sending your request you accept the Data Protection Policy of vLex Networks S.L. I have read and accept the Terms of Use
via RSS

4.125 documents for ex parte communication

- 40 CFR 304.25 - Ex parte communication.
- Code of Federal Regulations - Title 40: Protection of Environment
- 29 CFR 2200.105 - Ex parte communication.
- Code of Federal Regulations - Title 29: Labor
- 31 CFR 10.69 - Representation; ex parte communication.
- Code of Federal Regulations - Title 31: Money and Finance: Treasury

- Hoskinson v. Lambert, (Ohio 2011)
Quiet title - motion to file supplemental complaint, attorney fees, punitive damages; ex parte communication
- Ohio Supreme Court
- 30 CFR 44.8 - Ex parte communication.
- Code of Federal Regulations - Title 30: Mineral Resources
- Gregory Drake, Petitioner V. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent
Prior to a scheduled Section 6330 hearing with the petitioners, the IRS settlement officer received a memorandum brom the respondent's insolvency unit advisor that questioned the credibility and motives of the petitioner's counsel in a prior court proceeding. The petitioner was not provided an opportunity to participate in the ex parte communication. the Tax Court held that the memorandum constituted a prohibited ex parte communication pursuant to Rev. Proc. 2000-43 and therefore the instant case be remanded to the IRS' Appeals Office for a new hearing.
- United States. Tax Court. Reports
- Vol. 125 Nbr. 3/4, September 2005
- State v. Heard, (Ohio 2011)
DEFENDANT WAS NOT DENIED A FULL AND FAIR SENTENCING HEARING WHERE NOTHING IN THE RECORD INDICATES THE TRIAL COURT PARTICIPATED IN INAPPROPRIATE EX PARTE COMMUNICATION, AND WHEN THE TRIAL COURT DID NOT ALLOW IN SOCIAL WORKERS OPINION.
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Missouri Appeals Court Gets Second Round of Hipaa
To understand why the parameters of HIPAA have caused so much trouble for the plaintiffs' and the defense bar alike, you have to think fourth dimensionally. Sixteen years ago, before the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act was a twinkle in Congress' eye, the Missouri Supreme Court issued a pair of not-too decisive decisions on whether doctors could talk to attorneys investigating personal injury and medical malpractice cases. The court said such interviews - known as ex parte communication - were neither required nor prohibited. Participation was entirely up to the doctor.
- Missouri Lawyers Media
- October 06, 2009
- State v. Adams, (Ohio 2010)
Aiding and abetting another in having a weapon while under disability; R.C. 2923.13(A)(3)/R.C. 2923.03(A)(2); constructive possession; indictment language tracking statute; ex parte communication with jury
- Ohio Supreme Court
- State v. Roberts, 110 Ohio St.3d 71 (2006)
Criminal law — Aggravated murder — Convictions affirmed — Court’s ex parte communication with prosecutor invalidates sentencing opinion — Death penalty vacated and resentencing ordered.
- Ohio Supreme Court