Episcopal Retirement Homes, Inc

• Top-Down and Bottom-Up

There are some who believe that nonprofit organizations are not particularly the best at managing business," says the president and CEO of Episcopal Retirement Homes Inc., a nonprofit organization that operates several retirement communities and provides senior outreach services. [...] starting with our board's involvement and senior leadership's involvement in identifying that strategic direction, adopting it, to communicating that to all the staff, to the residents, to engaging staff members in the creation of the systems and the policies and the new work culture that's necessary to achieve that, has been a way that we try to build commitment and understanding about where the organization's headed and what our vision truly is.

• Smart Business Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky
• Vol. 5 Nbr. 12, January 2010

• Davis v. Ohio Peace Officers Training Academy, (Ohio 2011)

Unpaid instructional fees. No showing of an expressed or implied contract. Promissory estoppel not applicable. Judgment for defendant.

... contract.   Episcopal Retirement Homes, Inc. v. Ohio Dept. of Indus. Relations (1991),...

• Ohio Supreme Court

• RPTS, Inc. v. FMC Tubular & Equip. Corp., (Ohio 2012)

Trial court incorrectly granted summary judgment because genuine issues of material fact exist regarding whether transportation quote sheet was an offer and whether receiving party accepted it.

....”  Id. (citing Episcopal Retirement Homes Inc. v. Ohio Dept. of Indus.  Relations,...

• Ohio Supreme Court

• Zucco Painting & Wallcovering, Inc. v. DeLorean, (Ohio 2011)

jurisdiction, magistrate, manifest weight of the evidence, apparent agency, contract

...[.]”  Id. citing Episcopal Retirement Homes, Inc. v. Ohio Dept. of Indus.  Relations�...

• Ohio Supreme Court

• JNT Properties, L.L.C. v. Keybank Natl. Assn., (Ohio 2011)

Trial court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of KeyBank reversed; Issues of fact with respect to parties’ intent and ambiguity in contract (promissory note that uses the 365/360 method to calculate interest).

....   Episcopal Retirement Homes, Inc. v. Ohio Dept. of Indus. Relations (19...

• Ohio Supreme Court

• Bertovich v. St. John, (Ohio 2012)

Contract for purchase of home was unenforceable because there was no meeting of minds regarding whether buyer or seller was to pay for repairs required by city’s point-of-sale inspection; closing date in real estate transaction is generally not an essential term of contract and court could have imposed a reasonable time for performance of agreement; buyer did not incur any damages when sale did not go through because he purchased another home that needed no repairs for less than he would have paid for first home.

....2000); see also  Episcopal Retirement Homes, Inc. v. Ohio Dept. of Indus. Relations, 61 Ohio...

• Ohio Supreme Court

• Zurz v. 770 W. Broad AGA, L.L.C., (Ohio 2011)

The trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of defendants-appellees on plaintiffs-appellants’ claim for violation of Ohio’s prevailing wage laws. The trial court erred in concluding that Ohio’s prevailing wage law did not apply to the project, which involved a defendant’s construction of improvements to real property leased to the state for use by a state agency, based solely on the absence of public funds spent on the project.

....C. 4115.03(C).  Episcopal Retirement Homes, Inc. v.  Ohio Dept. of Indus. Relations ...'s clear statement of the law in  Episcopal Retirement Homes and U.S. Corr. Corp., the tri...

• Ohio Supreme Court

• Crossfire Newspaper Group, Inc. v. Hetrick, (Ohio 2011)

CONTRACTS - sufficient evidence to establish essential terms. AGENCY - abuse of discretion; personal liability.

...*13, citing Episcopal  Retirement Homes, Inc. v. Ohio Dept. of Indus. Relations (19...

• Ohio Supreme Court

• B.W. Rogers Co. v. Wells Bros., Inc., (Ohio 2012)

Appellants appeal the trial court's finding that the Memorandum of Intent between the parties constituted a final, enforceable contract. Appellants contend that the trial court erred when it failed to grant its motion for summary judgment; when it found that a valid agreement existed; when it erroneously “filled in the gaps” in the purported agreement; and when it failed to enforce the terms/time limitations of the alleged contract. The facts supported the finding of the trial court and the judgment is affirmed.

...v. Joshua Homes, 191 Ohio  App.3d 493, 2010-Ohio-6296, 946 ... the contract.” Id.;  Episcopal  Retirement Homes, Inc. v. Ohio Dep't. of Industrial Relation...

• Ohio Supreme Court

• Heisler v. Mallard Mechanical Co., L.L.C., (Ohio 2010)

Dismissal of complaint was proper. Prior opinion referencing dismissal without prejudice was simply dicta and did not revisit an earlier determination that complaint had been dismissed with prejudice. Complaint failed to state a claim for breach of contract and violation of CSPA. A new contract was never formed and appellees’ actions did not violate the CSPA.

... of the case." Gissiner at ¶15, citing Episcopal School of Cincinnati v. Levin, 117 Ohio St.3d 412,...at ¶28, citing Episcopal Retirement Homes, Inc. v. Ohio Dept. of Indus. Relations (199...

• Ohio Supreme Court