employment services contract

Receive alerts:
by e-mail
E-mail Your information will be added to a database with the sole purpose of serving your subscription. This database is the exclusive property of vLex Networks S.L. and will never be shared with any other company. By sending your request you accept the Data Protection Policy of vLex Networks S.L. I have read and accept the Terms of Use
via RSS

More than 10.000 documents for employment services contract

- MAXIMUS Wins $31.5 Million Employment Services Contract Rebid in Australia.
Business Editors RESTON, Va.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Aug. 14, 2003 MAXIMUS (NYSE:MMS) Australia arm, MAXNetwork, has been awarded through a competitive ...
- Business Wire
- August 14, 2003
- 26 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 571, 26 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,069, 29 Cont.Cas.Fed. (Cch) 81,706 General Motors Corporation, Appellee, v. Ray F. Marshall, Secretary U. S. Department of Labor; Weldon J. Rougeau, Director, Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs, U. S. Department of Labor; Harold Brown, Secretary, U. S. Department of Defense; Lt. Gen. W. W. Vaughn, Director Defense Logistics Agency, U. S. Department of Defense; James W. Cisco, Executive Director Contractor Employment Compliance, Defense Logistics Agency, U. S. Department of Defense; Oswald L. Jordan, Director, Directorate of Contractor Employment Compliance, Defense Contract Administration Services Region, Boston, U. S. Department of Defense; Thomas J. Mulligan, Jr., Commander Defense Contract Administration Services Region, Boston, Defense Logistics Agency, U. S. Department of Defense, Appellants. Equal Employment Advisory Council, Amicus Curiae. Burroughs Corporation, Appellee, v. Harold Brown, Secretary of United States Department of ..., 654 F.2d 294 (4th Cir. 1981)
Douglas N. Letter, Civ. Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C. (Alice Daniel, Asst. Atty. Gen., Washington, D. C., Justin W. Williams, U. S. Atty.,...
- Federal Circuits
- Employer May Enforce 'Unilateral' Agreement Not to Compete
An employer could enforce a noncompete agreement even though at the time the agreement was executed, the employer had no obligations corresponding to those imposed on the employee, the Texas Supreme Court has ruled. The plaintiff, a banking management services firm, hired the defendant as a financial consultant. The employment contract between the parties provided that the defendant could be terminated "at will." The agreement further contained a noncompete clause that prohibited the defendant from providing consulting services to any of the firm's clients for a period of one year after separation.
- Lawyers USA
- November 20, 2006

- Different Description Of Scope Of Services In Outsourcing Contract Can Avoid TUPE Impact - OCS v Jones, Employment Appeal Tribunal...
Under the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (more commonly known as TUPE), employees are automatically transferred ...
- Mondaq Business Briefing
- Nbr. 2009, January 2009
- 20 CFR 655.103 - Overview of this subpart and definition of terms.
...CHAPTER V: EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. ... The first date the employer requires the services of H-2A workers as indicated in the Application fo...H-2A Labor Contractor (H-2ALC). Any person who meets the definition of e...
- Code of Federal Regulations - Title 20: Employees' Benefits
- Implementing Non-Compete Clauses
In an age of increasing depersonalization of many services, the insurance industry remains largely dependent upon personal relationships. An employment agreement is a written contract between an employee and employer that documents the expectations of both parties. Employment agreements typically address such items as employee duties, compensation, duration of employment and termination. However, strong employment agreements for insurance agencies also include provisions that address the ownership of the book of business, non-solicitation, and non-competition. These additional provisions can go a long way to protect the underlying value of an insurance agency, its expirations. The goal of a non-competition clause or agreement is to protect the agency from the direct competition of a for...
- Rough Notes
- Vol. 152 Nbr. 5, May 2009
- Lake Cty. Bar Assn. v. Smith, 85 Ohio St.3d 402 (1999)
Attorneys at law - Misconduct - Public reprimand - Neglecting an entrusted legal matter - Failing to carry out contract of employment for professional services.
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Greene Cty. Bar Assn. v. Fodal, 92 Ohio St.3d 99 (2001)
Attorneys at law — Misconduct — Indefinite suspension — Engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice — Engaging in conduct adversely reflecting on fitness to practice law — Neglect of an entrusted legal matter — Failing to carry out contract of employment for professional services — Failing to promptly deliver funds or other property belonging to client — Failing to cooperate in disciplinary investigation — Engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation.
- Ohio Supreme Court
- NASA v. Nelson, 562 U.S. 2011 (2011)
... federal civil servants and Government contract employees. Respondents are contract employees at N...Administrator of General Services, 433 U. S. 425, 457. In Whalen, the Court upheld a... included on SF-85 and Form 42 in an employment background investigation that is subjectto the Pri...
- U.S. Supreme Court
- Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Simakis, 86 Ohio St.3d 545 (1999)
Attorneys at law - Misconduct - Six-month suspension with sanction to commence after conclusion of current suspension - Neglecting an entrusted legal matter - Intentionally failing to carry out contract of employment for professional services.
- Ohio Supreme Court