-
The Senate Judiciary Committee opened a hearing Feb. 6 inquiring into reports of electronic surveillance allegedly done in contravention of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, 50 U.S.C. Sections 1801 et seq.
Ever since James Risen's Dec. 16, 2005, article in the New York Times reporting on the National Security Agency's extrajudicial electronic surveillance of U.S. persons, many have joined the debate over the proper scope of and authority for domestic electronic surveillance.
-
The following article was published in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly, a sister publication.
BOSTON - The Senate Judiciary Committee opened a hearing Feb. 6 inquiring into reports of electronic surveillance allegedly done in contravention of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, 50 U.S.C. Sections 1801 et seq.
-
In this final rule, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) is amending its regulations to require each regional transmission organization (RTO) and independent system operator (ISO) to electronically deliver to the Commission, on an ongoing basis, data related to the markets that it administers. Specifically, the Commission is amending its regulations to establish ongoing electronic delivery of data relating to physical and virtual offers and bids, market awards, resource outputs, marginal cost estimates, shift factors, financial transmission rights, internal bilateral contracts, uplift, and interchange pricing. Such data will facilitate the Commission's development and evaluation of its policies and regulations and will enhance Commission efforts to detect anti-competiti...
-
Observing or listening to persons, places, or activities?usually in a secretive or unobtrusive manner?with the aid of electronic ...
-
-
The recent ruckus over the National Security Agency's warrantless electronic surveillance program has once again brought electronic privacy rights to the forefront of public discourse. According to publicly available information, one NSA program involved the monitoring of international telephone communications in order to identify terrorists. The other program involved NSA requests to telephone carriers to turn over customer call records; the NSA would then sift through these records for links to terrorists.
The White House and the Department of Justice have stuck to their guns, claiming that explicit and implicit executive branch powers authorize warrantless surveillance in the interests of national security. On the other side, many members of Congress and the vast majority of American...
-
Robert S. Adler (argued), St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Gerald P. Greiman, (argued), Clayton, MO (Martin M. Green and Joe D. Jacobson, on brief), for...
-
I. INTRODUCTION
As technology advances, the ability of the government to monitor electronic communications has become crucial for fighting crime and...
-
Introduction
Health and Economic Burdens of Foodborne Illness
Frequently cited statistics indicate that the health and economic burden of foodborn...
-
Watching Eric Holder's confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee, I greatly regretted that the chief legal officer of the "Change We Can Believe In" administration assured us that it would support George W. Bush's insistence - in the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) amendments of 2008 - that our telecommunications companies must be immunized from any lawsuits about their complicity in the previous administration's secret massive surveillance of our telephone and internet communications.
Sen. Obama, after pledging his opposition to that bill by intending to filibuster it, wound up voting for it, to the deep disappointment and surprise of some of his ardent supporters. Now, under President Obama, Verizon, AT&T and other major telecommunications organizations a...