double jeopardy court cases
-
Who has the authority to hire, fire, promote, or demote you? For an individual environmental health worker, that authority is generally specified in a...
-
The Supreme Court on Thursday limited the Constitution's protection against double jeopardy in cases of multiple charges and deadlocked juries.
The court said a jury's unanimous but tentative vote to acquit a defendant on some charges while deadlocked on others does not count as a verdict.
-
... charged offense was not an acquittal for double jeopardy purposes. Held: The Double Jeopardy Cl...S.808, 827. And the logic of those cases still holds. As for the objectionthat the rule den...
-
WASHINGTON - The U.S. Supreme Court Thursday limited the Constitution's protection against double jeopardy in cases involving multiple charges and deadlocked juries.
The 6-3 decision holds that a jury's unanimous but tentative vote to acquit a defendant on some charges does not count as a verdict.
-
... for preferring charges in serious criminal cases shows the high place it held as an instrument of j... function of grand juries in federal courts is to return criminal indictments, but the juries... . Double Jeopardy . Development and Scope . "The constit...
-
The Supreme Court held in United States v. Ursery that civil forfeitures do not qualify as punishment for purposes of the double jeopardy clause. The court thereby reversed two Sixth and Ninth Circuit cases precluded a criminal punishment and a civil forfeiture from taking plance in parallel proceedings. The court erred in not fashioning a fairer test for determining when the Double Jeopardy Clause should bar civil forfeitures.
-
The lawyer for a man convicted of killing an 81-year-old woman 16 years ago argued before the Missouri Supreme Court on Thursday that her client's conviction should be set aside on grounds of double jeopardy.
Attorney Elizabeth Unger Carlyle asked the court to find that double jeopardy bars retrial in cases where the prosecutor commits intentional misconduct, which is what she alleges happened to defendant Walter Barton. The issue hasn't been decided by either the state Supreme Court or the U.S. Supreme Court, she said, adding that a ruling in Barton's favor by the state court wouldn't be a departure from federal precedent.
-
... any manifest necessity to do so, the Double Jeopardy Clause barred the State from trying him a... cited this Court’s double jeopardy cases—from Perez to Washington—applying those precedents to...
-
... that the issue-preclusion component of the Double Jeopardy Clause therefore barred a second trial fo... decided an exceptionally large number of cases interpreting this provision, see, e.g., United Sta...
-
... UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS. FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. ROBERT J... his right under the Fifth Amendment's Double Jeopardy Clause not to be "twice put in jeopardy o.... In a later trio of double jeopardy cases, the Supreme Court addressed double jeopardy conse...