direct examination of police officer

Receive alerts:
by e-mail
E-mail Your information will be added to a database with the sole purpose of serving your subscription. This database is the exclusive property of vLex Networks S.L. and will never be shared with any other company. By sending your request you accept the Data Protection Policy of vLex Networks S.L. I have read and accept the Terms of Use
via RSS

More than 10.000 documents for direct examination of police officer

- State v. Leach, (Ohio 2005)
Manifest weight of the evidence – sufficiency of the evidence – direct and circumstantial evidence – identity – failure to comply with order of a police officer – cross-examination – trial strategy – ineffective assistance of counsel – sentencing – record on appeal – transcript of sentencing hearing – presume regularity – preliminary hearing – due process – equal protection – R.C. 2945.71(C)(1) – R.C. 2921.331 – Crim.R. 5(B).
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Mayle v. Felix, 545 U.S. ___ (2005)
... inculpatory statements during pretrial police interrogation. He alleged that those statements we...These statements were adduced at trial on direct examination of the investigating officer. Felix ur...
- U.S. Supreme Court
- The Louisiana 'Explanatory Exception': Faithfulness to Louisiana?s Hearsay Framework or Mere Storytime with the Prosecution?
Introduction - II. Anatomy of an Anecdote: What Is the Explanatory - Exception? - A. The Rule: Hearsay - B. The "Exception": Explanation - C. What It Was and What It Is - D. Scope of the Exception - . Relevancy - . Verbal Statements v. Conduct - . Constitutional Restrictions - . Other Evidentiary Limitations - III. Louisiana’s Application of the Explanatory Exception: - A Tumultuous Tale - A. The Supreme Court Trilogy - B. Too Much Hearsay Relevancy - C. Uncaging of the Beast: Inconsistent Appellate - Application - . Blatant Explanatory Exception Abuse - . Specific Categories of Misuse - IV. Resolving the Plot’s Central Conflict: How to Legally - Apply the Explanatory Exception in Louisiana - A. Return to a Proper Relevancy Analysis - . Explanations of an Officer’s Conduct - . Explan...
- Louisiana Law Review
- Nbr. 71-4, July 2011

- State v. Warmus, (Ohio 2011)
Court did not abuse its discretion by allowing non-expert, eyewitnesses in murder trial to testify to their opinion that the defendant could have safely retreated without resorting to the use of deadly force. Court abused its discretion by allowing an expert in audio recordings to give his interpretation of words spoken on a recording of a 911 call. The expert could competently testify to the methods he used to enhance the sound quality of the recording, but the meaning of the words spoken on the recording were a question of fact for the jury to decide in the first instance.

... replied that he was going to call the police and the owner of the parking lot to complain. ... cruiser following his arrest, he told an officer that after Williams released him from the head... example, asking Warmus during cross-examination: “Where did you learn that type of military�... assertion on direct examination that the “most trouble” he had b...
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Rep. Scott Garrett Holds a Hearing On the Sec Budget
... ROBERT COOK, DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF TRADING AND MARKETS, ... OFFICE OF COMPLIANCE INSPECTIONS AND EXAMINATIONS, SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIO... consequences for the SEC's ability to police our capital markets. So I'm pleased to have a rep...Most recently I was Chief Investment Officer at Goldman-Sachs Asset Management, responsible for...
- Political Transcript Wire
- March 21, 2011
- Michigan v. Bryant, 562 U.S. (2011)
... victim, Anthony Covington, made topolice officers who discovered him mortally wounded in agas statio... at trial of Covington's statements to the police.We hold that the circumstances of the interaction ... before it because at the preliminary examination, theprosecution, after first invoking both the dyi... which the Confrontation Clause was directed was thecivil-law mode of criminal procedure, and p...
- U.S. Supreme Court
- State v. Capers, (Ohio 2011)
For a defendant sentenced after the effective date of Section 2929.19.1 of the Ohio Revised Code, a trial courts post-release control sentencing error does not render the judgment a nullity.

... her closet and called the police. When police arrived, they found and arrested M... Later, during the direct examination of a police officer, Mr. Capers objec...
- Ohio Supreme Court
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Ray Terry, Gordon Lynn Peeler, Defendants-Appellants., 729 F.2d 1063 (6th Cir. 1984)
...On cross-examination, both defendants extensively impeached Harrill's ddirect testimony. In the course of his testimony, Harrill... the government's direct examination of a police officer, the officer--in one fell swoop--made dire...
- Federal Circuits
- Burns v. Reed, 500 U.S. 478 (1991)
... shot her sons while they slept, Indiana police sought the advice of respondent Reed, a state pros... their multiple-personality theory, the officers detained Burns and again sought the advice of Reed...The District Court granted Reed a directed verdict, and the Court of Appeals affirmed, holdin...Page 500 U.S. 478, 482. examination and a voice stress test, submitted exculpatory han...
- U.S. Supreme Court
- Lego v. Twomey: the improbable relationship between an obscure Supreme Court decision and wrongful convictions.
... notwithstanding substantial evidence that police perjury is prevalent at such hearings, there is a ... propensity toward accepting police officers' testimony at face value, (5) irrespective of how ... are, in fact, wrongfully convicted as a direct result of the low burden of proof prescribed by th... are not subject to effective cross-examination. (312) With that said, the Supreme Court has inter...
- American Criminal Law Review
- Vol. 47 Nbr. 3, June 2010