defendant and plaintiff

4 similar searches for defendant and plaintiff

Receive alerts:
by e-mail
E-mail Your information will be added to a database with the sole purpose of serving your subscription. This database is the exclusive property of vLex Networks S.L. and will never be shared with any other company. By sending your request you accept the Data Protection Policy of vLex Networks S.L. I have read and accept the Terms of Use
via RSS

More than 10.000 documents for defendant and plaintiff

- Md. Court of Special Appeals Case Summaries: April 10, 2013
Labor & Employment Age discrimination BOTTOM LINE: Defendant was entitled to summary judgment on plaintiff's age discrimination claim, where defendant presented a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for its refusal to hire plaintiff and plaintiff failed to adduce sufficient evidence to meet his burden of establishing that defendant's reasons were pretextual and that its motive was discriminatory.
- The Daily Record (Baltimore)
- April 17, 2013
- Lynne S. Taylor, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Keisha Johnson, Plaintiff, v. Virginia Union University, Defendant-Appellee. Keisha Johnson, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Lynne S. Taylor, Plaintiff, v. Virginia Union University, Defendant-Appellee., 193 F.3d 219 (4th Cir. 1999)
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.[Copyrighted Materi...
- Federal Circuits
- Stay Pending Reexamination Granted, Even Though Plaintiff And Defendant Were Competitors, Because Plaintiff Did Not Move For A Preliminary Injunction
The defendant filed a motion to stay pending reexamination of the plaintiff's patent. The district court noted that the plaintiff and defendant are bo...

- the Scotts Company, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. United Industries Corporation, Defendant-Appellant, and Pursell Industries, Defendant. the Scotts Company, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pursell Industries, Defendant-Appellant, and United Industries Corporation, Defendant. the Scotts Company, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. United Industries Corporation, Defendant-Appellant, and Pursell Industries, Defendant., 315 F.3d 264 (4th Cir. 2002)
Before TRAXLER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Vacated and remanded by published opinion. Judge TRAXLER wrote the opinion, in which Judge KING an...
- Federal Circuits
- State of Ohio Dann v. Nacional, (Ohio 2011)
Decision and judgment entry. Defendant/counter plaintiffs motion for summary judgment granted and plaintiff/counter defendants motion for partial summary judgment denied.
- Ohio Supreme Court
- No Permanent Injunction If Plaintiff And Defendant Did Not Directly Compete; Ongoing Royalty To Be Applied Instead.
Addressing a lower court's decision to impose a permanent injunction, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed the lower court, find...
- Mondaq Business Briefing
- Nbr. 2012, January 2012
- Carolina Power and Light Company, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dynegy Marketing and Trade, Defendant-Appellee. Carolina Power and Light Company, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dynegy Marketing and Trade, Defendant-Appellee., 415 F.3d 354 (4th Cir. 2005)
ARGUED: Robert Allen Long, Jr., Covington & Burling, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Randall Maitland Roden, Tharrington, Smith, L.L.P., Raleigh, Nor...
- Federal Circuits
- Another Motion To Transfer Denied In Delaware Even Where Plaintiff, Defendant And Witnesses Are Located In California
It is fast becoming clear that it is very difficult to transfer a patent infringement case out of the United States District Court for the District of...
- Netscape Communications Corporation, Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee, and Microsoft Corporation, Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee, and America Online, Inc., Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee, v. Allan M. Konrad, Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellant., 295 F.3d 1315 (Fed. Cir. 2002)
Susan Marie Spaeth, Townsend and Townsend, of Palo Alto, CA, argued for defendant/counterclaimant-appellant. On the brief were Scott R. Campbell, and ...
- Federal Circuits
- Aptix Corporation, Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant, and Meta Systems, Inc., Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant, and Mentor Graphics Corporation, Counterclaim Defendant, v. Quickturn Design Systems, Inc., Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellee., 269 F.3d 1369 (Fed. Cir. 2001)
Appealed from: United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Judge William H. Alsup[Copyrighted Material Omitted] Raphael V. ...
- Federal Circuits